期刊文献+

单核苷酸多态性芯片与染色体核型分析在唐氏筛查高风险孕妇产前诊断中的比较研究 被引量:9

Comparison between single nucleotide polymorphism array and karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis in Down's screening abnormal pregnancy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨单核苷酸多态性芯片(SNP array)在唐氏筛查高风险孕妇胎儿染色体分析中的应用价值。方法:选取312例因唐氏筛查高风险的孕妇,行羊膜腔穿刺术后获得羊水,对羊水进行G显带核型分析和SNP array检测,比较核型分析与SNP array检测结果,并按年龄分组比较拷贝数变异(CNVs)的发生率差别。结果:核型分析和SNP array均准确发现2例21三体(0.64%),6例核型分析提示染色体平衡重组(1.92%)的样本经SNP array分析证实不存在重排片段重复或缺失。在303例核型正常的胎儿羊水细胞中,SNP array检测发现176例CNVs,其中良性CNVs 106例,临床意义不明确的CNVs(VOUS)61例,新发CNVs(de novo CNVs)9例,未发现已知的致病性CNVs。唐氏筛查高风险组与唐氏筛查高风险合并高龄组CNVs的分布差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。此外,本研究中首次报道14种CNVs。结论:SNP array可进一步确定核型分析的平衡易位是否存在染色体微缺失/重复。在核型正常的胎儿中,SNP array可检测出大量拷贝数异常,发现14种新的CNVs但现有数据库无法判断其临床意义,需进一步研究确认。此外,孕妇年龄对胎儿基因组中新发CNVs的发生率无明显影响。 AIM:To evaluate the clinical application of single nucleotide polymorphism array ( SNP array) in prenatal diagnosis for screening the abnormality of women with Down’ s syndrome ( DS) .METHODS:The amniotic fluid samples ( n=312) collected by amniocentesis for the DS screening abnormality women were tested by karyotyping and SNP array analysis, respectively.The findings of karyotyping and SNP array analysis were compared.RESULTS:Two cases of trisomy 21 were identified by karyotyping and SNP array analysis, but SNP array analysis failed to identify 6 cases of chro-mosome balanced structural rearrangement.SNP detected 176 cases copy number variants ( CNVs) in 303 cases normal karyotype were detected by SNP, including 106 benign CNVs, 61 variants of unknown significance (VOUS), 9 de novo CNVs, and none of them was pathogenic.The distribution difference of CNVs in DS screening positive group and DS screening positive plus advanced maternal age group was not statistically significant ( P〉0.05) .Furthermore, we reported 14 kinds of CNVs for the first time in population.CONCLUSION:SNP array can further assure chromosome microdupli-cation/microdeletion.In normal karyotype fetus of prenatal diagnosis, SNP can detect some clinical significant CNVs.
出处 《中国病理生理杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期707-712,共6页 Chinese Journal of Pathophysiology
基金 广东省科技计划(No.2009B060700107) 中山大学达安基因股份有限公司广州市医学诊断技术和产品创新及应用协同创新重大专项合作费(No.201400000004-4)
关键词 单核苷酸多态性芯片 染色体核型分析 拷贝数变异 产前诊断 Single nucleotide polymorphism array Karyotyping Copy number variants Prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Alberman ED, Creasy MR. Frequency of chromosomal ab- normalities in miscarriages and perinatal deaths [ J ]. J Med Genet, 1977, 14(5) : 313-315.
  • 2Obstet Gynecol. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 88, Decem- ber 2007. Invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy [ J ]. Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 110 (6) : 1459-1467.
  • 3Obstet Gynecol. Committee Opinion No. 581: the use of chromosomal microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis [ J 1. Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 122(6) :1374-1377.
  • 4Valduga M, Philippe C, Bach SP, et al. A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations[J]. Prenat Diagn, 2010, 30 (4) : 333-341.
  • 5Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. Consensus state- ment: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diag- nostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies [ J], Am J Hum Genet, 2010, 86 (5) : 749-764.
  • 6de Vries BB, Pfundt R, Leisink M, et al. Diagnostic ge- nome profiling in mental retardation [ J ]. Am J Hum Gen- et, 2005. 77(4):606-616.
  • 7陈瑛,蔡光伟.采用微阵列-比较基因组杂交进行产前诊断的局限性和困难[J].中华医学遗传学杂志,2011,28(1):47-51. 被引量:10
  • 8Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, et al. Chromosomal mi- croarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis [ J ]. N Engl J Med, 2012, 367(23) : 2175-2184.
  • 9Fiorentino F, Caiazzo F, Napolitano S, et al. Introducing array comparative genomic hybridization into routine prena- tal diagnosis practice: a prospective study on over 1 000 consecutive clinical cases[Jl. Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31 (13) : 1270-1282.
  • 10Breman A, Pursley AN, Hixson P, et al. Prenatal chro- mosomal mieroarray analysis in a diagnostic laboratory; ex- perience with > 1 000 eases and review of the literature [Jl- Prenat Diagn, 2012, 32(4) : 351-361.

二级参考文献37

  • 1Van Esch H, Bauters M, Ignatius J, et al. Duplication of the MECP2 region is a frequent cause of severe mental retardation and progressive neurological symptoms in males. Am J Hum Genet, 2005, 77:442-453.
  • 2Wordsworth S, Buchanan J, Regan R, et al. Diagnosing idiopathic learning disability: a cost-effectiveness analysis of microarray technology in the National Health Service of the United Kingdom. Genomic Med, 2007, 1:35-45.
  • 3Choy KW, Setlur SR, Lee C, et al. The impact of human copy number variation on a new era of genetic testing. BJOG, 2010, 117:391-398.
  • 4Bi W, Breman AM, Venable SF, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis using uncultured amniocytes and oligonucleotide array CGH. Prenat Diagn, 2008, 28:943-949.
  • 5Huang J, Pang J, Watanabe T, et al. Whole genome amplification for array comparative genomic hybridization using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded histological sections. J Mol Diagn, 2009,11 : 109-116.
  • 6Ozcan T, Burki N, Parkash V, et al. Cytogenetical diagnosis in paraffin-embedded fetoplacental tissue using comparative genomic hybridization. Prenat Diagn, 2000,20 : 41-44.
  • 7Mc Sherry EA, Mc Goldrick A, Kay EW, et al. Formalin fixed paraffin-embedded clinical tissues show spurious copy number changes in array-CGH profiles. Clin Genet, 2007, 72:441-447.
  • 8Loukianova TA, Tang SS, Kalousek DK. Quality control in components of comparative genomic hybridization technique used for diagnostic cytogenetic analysis. Prenat Oiagn, 2000, 20: 1019.
  • 9Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Canadas MP, et al. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of common chromosome aneuploidies by QF-PCR. Assessment on 18,000 consecutive clinical samples. Mol Hum Reprod, 2004, 10:839 846.
  • 10Klinger K, I.andes G, Shook D, et al. Rapid detection of chromosome aneuploidies in uncultured amniocytes by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Am J Hum Genet, 1992, 51:55-65.

共引文献9

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部