期刊文献+

国有企业员工身份多元化下的员工参与研究 被引量:1

The Study of The Employee Involvement Based on The Staffidentity Diversity of The State-owned Enterprise
原文传递
导出
摘要 国有企业员工身份组成发生了改变,对员工身份多元化基础上的员工参与带来很大的挑战。为有助于对国有企业员工身份多元化下的员工参与的理解和研究,本文在梳理以前员工参与和多元化管理的相关研究基础上,把制度理论和资源基础观理论整合起来,作为相互的补充,构建了员工参与的研究框架,并利用这个框架指出对实践的指导以及将来研究的几个方向。本文提出的框架即分析每一理论分别对国有企业员工身份多元化下的员工参与的影响,又认可了两种理论对员工参与影响的共性,这为研究国有企业员工身份多元化下的员工参与提供了更大的研究空间。 The changing staff-identity composition of the state-owned enterprise has made much great challenge to the Employee Involvement based on staff-identity diversity. In order to help understanding this topic well, I propose a research model of antecedents and outcomes of the Employee Involvement applying the Institutional Theory and Resource-based Theory after reviewing the extant literature on antecedents and outcomes of the Employee Involvement. At last I outline four possible avenues for future research about the Employee Involvement of staff-identity diversity in the state-owned enterprise. In this paper I analysis each theory independently, and ,simultaneously, acknowledge the common implications of the two theories to the Employee Involvement, doing this can provides us more research space to study the Employee Involvement of staff-identity diversity of the state-owned entemrise.
作者 郑刚 崔勋
机构地区 南开大学商学院
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 北大核心 2015年第9期13-20,共8页 Human Resources Development of China
基金 国家自然科学基金面上项目"雇佣方式多元化下的中国企业雇佣策略研究"(71272182) 教育部人文社会科学研究一般项目"我国人力资源多样化对企业有效性的影响路径研究"(12JYA630021)资助
关键词 员工身份多元化下的员工参与 制度理论 资源基础观理论 框架构建 研究启示 The Employee Involvement of Staff-identity Diversity InstitutionalTheo .ry Resource-based Theory Research Model The Avenues
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Barney J B, Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99-120.
  • 2Barney J B, Clark D N. Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. New York, NY: Oxford University Press,2007.
  • 3Ben-Ner A, Jones D C.Employce participation, ownership and produetivity:A theoretical framework. Industrial Relations, 1995, 34(4): 532-554.
  • 4Clegg H A. Pluralism in industrial relations. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1975,13: 309-316.
  • 5DiMaggio P, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: institutional is omorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review,1983,48:147-160.
  • 6Edelman L B. Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil fights law. American Journal of Sociology, 1992,97:1531 - 1576.
  • 7Fernie S, Metcalf D. Participation, contingent pay, representation and workplace performance: Evidence from Great Britain.British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1995,33(3):379-415.
  • 8Hammer, Tove H.et al. Worker representation on boards of directors: A study of competing roles. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 1991, 44:661-670.
  • 9Heller F, Pusie E,Strauss G,Wilpert B. Organizational participation: Myth and Reality. Oxford University Press. Oxford,1998.
  • 10Kermedy M T, Fiss P C.lnstitufionalization, framing, and diffusion: The logic of TQM adoption and implementation decisions among U.S. hospitals. Academy of Management Journal,2009,52:897-918.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部