期刊文献+

Quantification of the effects of management factors on maize (Zea mays L.) and cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) residues decomposition rate

Quantification of the effects of management factors on maize (Zea mays L.) and cotton(Gossypium hirsutum L.) residues decomposition rate
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Efforts to quantify management effects on decomposition rate of added substrates to the soil is important especially where such information is to be used for prediction in mathematical or simulation models. Using data from a short term (60 days) greenhouse simulation study, a procedure for quantifying effects of management on SOM and substrate decomposition is presented. Using microbial growth rate u (q), microbial efficiency in substrate utilization e (q), specific decomposition rates for added plant residues to two contrasting soils, red earth (Ferrasol) and black earth (Acrisol) were estimated. The treatments included straw addition + buried, (T1); straw addition + mineral N (T2); and straw addition + tillage, (T3). Sampling was done every 15 days. Straw decomposition rate was affected by external mineral N sources (Urea 46% N). Addition of an external N source significantly increased decomposition rates. The study could not, however, fully account for the effect of tillage on residues because of the limited effect of the tillage method due to the artificial barrier to mechanical interference supplied by the mesh bags. It is concluded that using few decomposer parameters, decomposition rates and consequently SOM trends in a soil system can be monitored and quantification of the influence of perturbations on decomposition rate of added substrates possible. Efforts to quantify management effects on decomposition rate of added substrates to the soil is important especially where such information is to be used for prediction in mathematical or simulation models. Using data from a short term (60 days) greenhouse simulation study, a procedure for quantifying effects of management on SOM and substrate decomposition is presented. Using microbial growth rate u (q), microbial efficiency in substrate utilization e (q), specific decomposition rates for added plant residues to two contrasting soils, red earth (Ferrasol) and black earth (Acrisol) were estimated. The treatments included straw addition + buried, (T1); straw addition + mineral N (T2); and straw addition + tillage, (T3). Sampling was done every 15 days. Straw decomposition rate was affected by external mineral N sources (Urea 46% N). Addition of an external N source significantly increased decomposition rates. The study could not, however, fully account for the effect of tillage on residues because of the limited effect of the tillage method due to the artificial barrier to mechanical interference supplied by the mesh bags. It is concluded that using few decomposer parameters, decomposition rates and consequently SOM trends in a soil system can be monitored and quantification of the influence of perturbations on decomposition rate of added substrates possible.
出处 《Journal of Environmental Sciences》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2002年第2期165-172,共8页 环境科学学报(英文版)
基金 TheNationalNaturalScienceFoundationofChina (No .988940 0 4)
关键词 management factors residue decomposition rate MAIZE COTTON red soil black soil management factors residue decomposition rate maize cotton red soil black soil
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Agren A I. Bosatta E, 1987. Theoretical analysis of the long-term dynamics of carbon and nitrogen in soils J ]. Ecology 68( 5 ): 1181- 1189.
  • 2Amador J A, Jones R D, 1993. Nutrient limitations on microbial respiration in peat soils with different total phosphorous content[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 25: 793-801.
  • 3Bosatta E, Agren A I, 1985. Theoretical analysis of decomposition of heterogeneous substrates[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 17:601-610.
  • 4Bosatta E, Berendse F, 1984. Energy or nutrient regulation of decomposition: Implications for the mineralization- immobilization response to perturbations[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 16:63-67.
  • 5Bosatta E, G I Agren, 1990. Theoretical analysis of carbon and nutrient interactions in soils under energy-limited conditions[J]. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 55:728-733.
  • 6Campbell C A, McConkey B G, Zentner R P et al., 1995. Carbon sequestration in a Brown Chernozem as affected by tillage and rotation[J].Can J Soil Sci, 75:449-458.
  • 7Collins H P, Elliot E T, Paustian K, 2000. Soil carbon pools and fluxes in long-term corn belt agroecosystems[J].Soil Biol Biochem, 32:157-168.
  • 8Donnison L M, Griffith G S, Hedger J, 2000. Management influences on soil microbial communities and their function in botanieally diverse haymeadows of northern England and Wales[J]. Soil Biol Biochem, 32:253-263.
  • 9Douglas C L, Allmaras R R, Rasmussen P E, 1980. Wheat straw composition and placement effects on decomposition in dryland agriculture of the Pacific Northwest[J] . Soil Sci Soc Am J, 44: 833-837.
  • 10Foster N W, Beauchamp E G, Corke C T, 1980. Microbial activity in a Pinus banksiana Lamb. forest floor amended with nitrogen and carbon [J]. Can J Soil Sci, 60:199-209.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部