零判决现象的反思与批判

Rethinking the Phenomenon of “Zero Judgment”

零判决是大调解机制和调解优先政策引发的高调解率的极致表现。法院往往将这种现象与长存于中国传统司法文化中的无讼理念密切联系起来,并大加倡扬。经过人为修饰和加工的零判决现象实际上与无讼理念不具有必然的逻辑关联,无讼理念不能作为零判决的正当基础,更找不到证成零判决的其他法律理论,反过来,零判决也未必能达到无讼理念所要求的彻底解决纠纷。零判决更因其诉讼虚无主义、法治理念虚化和解纷方式错位等不当倾向,不应作为司法实践追求的目标。在反思零判决和高调解率时,应当注重制度运营者和制度利用者的视角融合。

＂Zero judgment＂ is the extreme performance of the high mediation rate triggered by the policy of priority to the mediation under multipartite mediation mechanism, which is al- ways advocated by the court because of the ＂no lawsuit idea＂ rooted in Chinese traditional cul- ture. However,there is no logical inevitability in the relationship between ＂zero judgment＂ and ＂no lawsuit idea＂. Therefore, ＂no lawsuit idea＂ shouldn＇ t be used to justify＂ zero judgment＂. Beyond that, any rationality basis for ＂zero judgment＂ can＇t be found. On the contrary ,the evi- dence addresses that ＂zero judgment＂ seems to be difficult to solve the dispute thoroughly which is desired by ＂no lawsuit idea＂. In addition,＂ zero judgment＂ is always accompanied with legal procedure nihilism, nominal law - governed society, misplacement of the court＇ s role and so on. In order to solve these problems,＂ zero judgment＂ should be ruled out from the goals of judicial practices. The rethinking of ＂zero judgment＂ and high mediation rate performance requirements that currently exist should base on the fusion of legal regime operators, view and legal regime utilizers ＇ perspective.