抗逆力的跨文化研究被引量：7

Resilience Across Cultures

下载PDF

导出

摘要文章通过对全球范围内14个研究基地、1500多名青少年的混合研究,验证了在文化和环境基础上人们对抗逆力涵义理解的四种命题:(1)除了全球性,青少年身处的文化性、环境性因素都会对其抗逆力的形成产生影响;(2)抗逆力对青少年产生怎样的影响取决于形成该抗逆力的具体文化和环境;(3)影响青少年抗逆力形成的因素与能够反映青少年的文化背景显著相关;(4)个人与其所处文化环境之间张力(tension)的解决方法,很大程度上反映出个体与抗逆力之间的联系。 Findings from a 14 site mixed methods study of over 1500 youth globally support four propositions that underlie more culturally and contextually embedded understanding of resilience : 1 ) there are global , as well as culturally and contextually specific aspects to young people' s lives that contribute to their resilience;2) aspects of resilience exert differing amounts of influence on child's life depending on specific culture and context in which resilience is realized ; 3 ) aspects of children' s lives that contribute to resilience are related to one another in patterns that reflect a child's culture and context;4)tensions between individual and their cultures and contexts are resolved in ways reflect highly specific relationship between aspects of resilience. The implication of this cultural and contextual understanding of resilience to interventions with at - risk populations are discussed.

作者 Michael Ungar 王然田国秀

机构地区加拿大Dalhousie大学社会工作学院首都师范大学政法学院首都师范大学社会学与社会工作系

出处《首都师范大学学报（社会科学版）》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第2期120-130,共11页 Journal of Capital Normal University：Social Science Edition

基金加拿大社会科学和人文研究委员会新斯科舍省健康研究基金会资助

关键词抗逆力跨文化研究跨文化实践文化生态理论 resilience, cross - cultural research , cross - cultural practice, culture, ecological theory

分类号 B844.2 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Ungar, M. A constructionist discourse on resilience: Muhiple contexts, multiple realities among at -risk children and youth. Youth and Society, 2004,35 (3) , 341 - 365.
2Ungar, M. and Liebenberg, L. The International Resilience Project: A mixed methods approach to the study of resilience across cultures. In M. Ungar ( ed. ) , Hand - book for working with children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts ( pp. 211 - 226). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage,2005.
3Boyden, J. and Mann, G. Children' s risk, resilience, and coping extreme situations. In M. Ungar (ed.) , Handbook for working with children and youth: Pathways to resilience across cultures and contexts ( pp. 3 - 26). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005.
4Ungar, M. , Lee. A.W. , Callaghan, T. and Boothroyd, R. An international collab - at University of Hong Kong on May 4, 2010 oration to study resilience in adolescents across cultures. Journal of Social Work Research and Evaluation, 2005,6 (1), 5 -24.
5Ungar, M. Final Report: International Resilience Project. Available online at http://www, resilienceproject, org [ Downloaded March 27, 2006 ].
6Garmezy, N. Vulnerable and invulnerable children: Theory, research, and intervention. Journal Supplement Abstract Service, A. P. A,1976.
7Rutter, M. , Maughan, B. , Mortimore, P. , and Ouston, J. Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press,1979.
8Werner, E. E. and Smith, R. S. (1982) Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York: McGraw - Hill.
9Cowen, E. L. The enhancement of psychological wellness: Challenges and oppor - tunities. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1994(2), 149-180.
10Kirby, L. D. and Fraser, M. W. Risk and resilience in childhood. In M. Fraser (ed.), Risk and resilience in childhood : An ecological perspective ( pp. 10 - 33). Washington, DC : NASW Press, 1997.