我国学术期刊评价体系现状及发展趋势

The status and development trend of Chinese academic journals evaluation system

【目的】梳理我国现存学术期刊评价体系,探讨学术期刊评价体系发展趋势。【方法】通过分析学术期刊评价体系的现状及存在问题,构建科学合理的学术期刊评价体系。【结果】中国的学术期刊评价体系主要有基于"质量评估"的"合格评价"和"优秀期刊评价"以及基于"影响力大小"的核心期刊评价,两种评价体系均有一定的局限性。我国各评价机构应进行整合或合作,将倡导学术规范作为重要职责,建立统一规范的适合中国国情的学术期刊评价体系,不断完善评价指标体系和评价方法,在遴选评价指标时,要更加注重评价指标对期刊质量的引导作用。【结论】只有各评价机构及管理部门深刻反思实际应用中存在的问题,才能真正构建科学合理的学术期刊评价体系。

[Purpose]The existing academic journals＇ evaluation system is investigated thoroughly in order to explore its development trend. [Methodology] By analyzing the status and problems of academic journals＇ evaluation system, a scientific and rational evaluation system is built. [ Findings] There are two kinds of academic journalsv evaluation system in China. One is based on the ＂quality assessment＂ of ＂qualified appraisal＂ and ＂excellent journal evaluation＂. The other is based on the ＂influence＂ of core journals＇ evaluation. These two evaluation systems both have certain limitations. Rating agencies in China should integrate and cooperate with each other, take advocating academic norms as an important responsibility, in order to establish a unified and normative academic journals＇ evaluation system suitable for China＇ s situation. And the evaluation parameter system and methods should be improved constantly. In the selection of evaluation parameters, its role of guiding the quality of journals should be paid more attention to. [Condusions] The problems in practical applications should be rethought profoundly by various rating agencies and administrations in order to build a real scientific and rational evaluation system of academic journals.