期刊文献+

非稳态噪声与作业工人高频听力损失的剂量-反应关系研究 被引量:22

A study on dose-response relationship between human hearing loss and non-stationary noise among workers
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究非稳态噪声作业工人的听力损失发生状况以及影响因素。方法采用横断面研究方法,以接触非稳态噪声≥1年的无耳病史的571名男性工人为研究对象,采用问卷调查噪声接触史、吸烟与饮酒等情况。对噪声接触者测定500、1 000、2 000、3 000、4 000和6 000 Hz 6个频段的听阈,并进行作业环境8 h等效声级检测,分析影响听力损失的因素。结果非稳态噪声作业工人双耳高频听力损失的患病率为52.54%,单耳高频听力损失患病率为71.98%(按人数计)。不同的现场噪声8 h等效声级、接噪工龄和累积噪声暴露量者之间听力损失的患病率差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.01)。8 h等效声级、接噪工龄和累积噪声暴露量与高频听力损失的危险性存在剂量-反应关系(P均<0.01)。结论非稳态噪声接触对作业工人高频听力造成损害,具有剂量-反应关系。 Objective To investigate the incidence and risk factors of hearing loss among the workers exposed to non -stationary noise.Methods A cross -sectional study was conducted among the participants.571 male workers without any history of ear disorder were enrolled in this study.They had been exposed to non -stationary noise for one year or more. The history of noise exposure,smoking and drinking behavior were interviewed by using a questionnaire.The noise exposure in the workplace was measured at eight -hour equivalent noise level (LEX.8h )and the thresholds of hearing at 500,1 000,2 000,3 000,4 000 and 6 000 Hz were detected.Results The prevalence of high -frequency hearing loss of two ears was 52.54%,while the prevalence of hearing loss of one ear was 71.98%.There were significant differences of prevalence among different groups of workers in LEX.8h ,duration of noise exposure and the cumulative noise exposure (CNE)(P〈0.01).There was a dose response relationship between noise exposure and the risk of hearing loss (P〈0.01).Conclusion Non -stationary noise exposure may contribute to hearing loss of workers.There is a good dose -effect relationship between the hearing loss and non -stationary noise.
出处 《浙江预防医学》 2015年第5期433-435,449,共4页 Zhejiang Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 杭州市医疗科研及重点专科专病项目(20110733Q19) 杭州市卫生科技计划重点项目(2011Z016)
关键词 非稳态噪声 高频听力损失 剂量-反应关系 Non -stationary noise High -frequency hearing loss Dose -response relationship
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha - Barrientos M, et al. The global burden of occupational noise - induced hearing loss [ J ]. American journal of industrial medicine, 2005, 48 (6) : 446 - 458.
  • 2Dobie RA. The burdens of age - related and occupational noise - induced hearing loss in the United States [ J ]. Ear Hear, 2008, 29 (4): 565-577.
  • 3中国职业安全健康协会.中国职业安全健康协会噪声与振动控制专业委员会工作报告[EB/OL].(2006—12—31)[2011—01-25].http://www.cosha.org.en/103278/103316/103664/147841.html.
  • 4梁友信,金泰庾,孙贵范.职业卫生与职业医学[M].6版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008.
  • 5祖爱华,崔晨,王欣,李红梅,莫民帅,赖洪飘.工业脉冲噪声对冲压工听力影响的调查[J].国际医药卫生导报,2012,18(3):429-433. 被引量:4
  • 6张莉莉,谢德兴,陈丽琼,周生添.接触不同类型噪声对工人听力损害的分析[J].中国工业医学杂志,2006,19(3):178-179. 被引量:17
  • 7中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ/T189.8-2007工作场所物理因素测量第8部分:噪声[S].北京:卫生部,2007.
  • 8中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ2.2-2007工作场所有害因素职业接触限值第2部分:物理因素[S].2007.
  • 9中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ49-2007职业性噪声聋诊断标准[S].2007.
  • 10张旭慧,朱益民,夏予勇.稳态噪声作业工人听力损失与噪声接触的剂量-反应关系[J].中国工业医学杂志,2001,14(2):72-74. 被引量:20

二级参考文献65

共引文献68

同被引文献224

引证文献22

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部