中止抑或不完成:诉讼时效完成障碍之婚姻关系——由一个案例引发的思考

Suspension or Uncomplete: the Statute of Limitations Obstacles of Marriage——Triggered by a case

夫妻婚前互负债务不因婚姻关系的缔结而混同灭失,婚姻关系存续期间,夫妻双方也有互负债务的可能与必要,诉讼时效制度仍有适用余地。然而,时效制度预设的主体对立前提与夫妻不分彼此的现实矛盾,其追求的权利效用观也与婚姻关系强调的伦理义务观抵牾,致使时效制度在婚姻关系中无法为通常完成。域外法制多将婚姻关系纳入时效完成障碍体系中,具体包括不完成和中止两种规制模式。我国诉讼时效制度未对婚姻关系做适切调整,立法层面应予以回应,可将其纳入时效中止的法定事由。

The premarital debts not concluded confusion and loss because of marriage, a husband and wife have mutual debt during the marriage may be necessary, system of the statute of limitations has still has room for application. However, the opposing presuppostion of the limitation system which discount the intimacy reality of the parties of a marriage , and the pursuit of the rights of the utility of limitation system which have a contradiction with marriage view of ethical obligations, as a reasult, the limitation system unable to normally complete in marriage. Many counrty almost make a special treat with marriage by two regulation patterns of both uncomplete and suspension. The barrier system of complete about statute of limitations in our country did not make appropriate adjustment to the marriage, legislative level should respond in the suspension of limitation.