传统手术与微创手术治疗疝气的临床效果比照观察

The Clinical Effect Observation by Traditional Operation and Minimally Invasive Operation in Treatment of Hernia

目的：探讨传统手术与微创手术治疗疝气的临床效果，并对其进行评价。方法选取我院于2012年12月-2014年12月收治的52例疝气患者，按照其住院时间的先后将患者分为实验组和对照组，对照组采用传统方法进行治疗，实验组使用微创手术方法进行治疗，使用统计学分析软件对两组患者治疗后的临床效果进行对比。结果通过对两组患者施以不同的治疗方法，观察其治疗效果发现，实验组患者的手术、自主活动、住院时间以及平均出血量，均低于对照组患者的数据，差异明显，有统计学意义（P＜0.05）。结论通过研究发现，奥扎格雷钠联合依达拉奉治疗脑梗死的使用微创手术治疗疝气临床效果明显，能够有效的减少其手术、自主活动、住院时间以及平均出血量。

Objective To explore traditional surgery and the clinical effect of minimally invasive surgery treatment of hernia, and carries on the appraisal.Methods From December 2012 to December 2014 were of 52 patients with hernia, according to the length of hospital stay of patients can be divided into the experimental group and the control group, control group using the traditional method to treatment, the experimental group treated with minimally invasive surgery method, using statistical analysis software for the clinical effect of two groups of patients after treatment were compared. Results By means of two groups of patients with different treatment methods and the therapeutic effect was observed, found that the experimental group of patients with surgery, independent activity, average blood loss, hospital stay, and were lower than the control group patients＇ data, clear difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Through the study found that of ozagrel sodium combined with dara in treatment of cerebral infarction clinical effect is obvious, the use of minimally invasive surgery hernia can effectively reduce the operation, independent activity, average blood loss, hospital stay, and is worthy of popularization and application.