摘要
反讽出现于各种符号领域,而不仅仅是语言领域,所以把它上升到符号修辞角度进行研究是很有必要的。从符号学角度重新界定反讽,认为反讽是一个符号文本被接收者解释出两个相互冲突的意义,其主要理论依据是皮尔斯的符号学思想。符号表意过程涉及三种意义,即意图意义、文本意义和解释意义,从发生的角度看,两两冲突即可形成反讽。反讽的两个冲突的意义不是语义反转,而是语义反差;两个意义之间有主次之分,否则即为"解释漩涡"。
Irony occurs in all kinds of sign domains, not in the sign of language＇ s. So it is necessary to study as a semiotic rhetoric. From the point of view of semiotics, irony contains two conflicting meanings interpreted by the addressee in a sign text, which is based on C. S. Peirce＇ theory on signs . There are three kinds of connotation in semiosic representation ： intention of the ad- dresser, meaning of the text and interpretation of the addressee. From the perspective of happening, every two of the three connotations conflict that could form irony. The two conflicting connotations aren＇t reversal but contrast. However, they do not enjoy the same status, with one the primary, while the other secondary. Otherwise it is the ＂vortex of interpretation＂.
出处
《南京社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第5期117-123,共7页
Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences
关键词
符号修辞
反讽
发生
反差
解释漩涡
semiotic rhetoric
irony
happen
contrast
vortex of interpretation
