期刊文献+

临床药师用药教育对患者哮喘控制的作用 被引量:9

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨临床药师用药教育对门诊患者哮喘控制的作用。方法对90例门诊哮喘患者进行哮喘控制测试(ACT)和吸入装置使用评价,开展用药教育,2周后再次进行ACT和吸入装置使用评价。结果 90例哮喘患者首次ACT平均分值(17.02±2.65)分,16例完全掌握吸入方法(17.8%)。对患者开展用药教育,2周后复诊时ACT平均(22.22±2.46)分(P<0.01),91.1%患者哮喘良好控制,88例(97.8%)完全掌握吸入方法。结论临床药师开展用药教育可显著提高门诊哮喘患者的吸入装置正确使用率,提高哮喘控制率。
出处 《医药导报》 CAS 2015年第5期685-686,共2页 Herald of Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献27

  • 1母双,何权瀛.支气管哮喘患者系统教育和管理效果评估[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2005,4(2):86-91. 被引量:28
  • 2王西华,骆益民,杨远,林勇,朱晓莉.哮喘患者MDI和都保吸入技术的调查以及健康教育对其的影响[J].东南大学学报(医学版),2005,24(6):389-391. 被引量:14
  • 3倪淑红.哮喘患者吸入激素依从性的调查与分析[J].浙江临床医学,2006,8(5):554-554. 被引量:12
  • 4Lai CK, de Guia TS, Kim YY, et al. Asthma control in the Asia - Pacific region: The Asthma Insights and Reality in Asia -Pacific Study [ J ]. J Allergy Clin Immunol,2003,111 (2) :263 - 268.
  • 5ZAINUDIN BMZ, KAI WEI LAI C, SORIANO JB, et al. Asthma control in adults in Asia - Pacific [ J ]. Respirology ,2005 ; 10 ( 5 ) : 579 - 586.
  • 6NIHBI/WHO Workshop Report: Global atrategy for asthma management and prevention NIH Pubhcation No. 02- 3659,2002,available on www. ginasthma. Com.
  • 7Barnes PJ, Barnett AH, Brewis RA, et al. British thoracis society. Guide- lines on the management of asthma. Thorax, 1993,48:1.
  • 8Barnes PJ, Pedersen S. Efficiency and safety of inhald corticosteroid in asthma. Am Rev Res Pir Dis, 1993,148:1.
  • 9RABE K F, VERMEIRE P A,SORIANO J B,et al. Clinical management of asthma in 1999: the asthma insights and reality in Europe (AIRE) study[J]. Eur Respir J, 2000,16(5) :802-807.
  • 10LAI C K, de GUIA T S, KIM Y Y, et al. Asthma control in the Asia-Pacific region: the asthma insights and reality in Asia-Pacific study[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2003,111(2) :263-268.

共引文献2568

同被引文献78

  • 1杜晓明,刘晓东,郭善斌,韩峰,菅凌燕.哮喘患儿的药学监护[J].中国药房,2007,18(32):2551-2553. 被引量:4
  • 2HAYES B D, DONOVAN J L, SMITH B S, et al. Pharmacist-conducted medication reconciliation in an emergency department[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm, 2007, 64(16): 1720-1723.
  • 3HIGGINS J P T, GREEN S. Cochrane handbook for sys-tematic reviews of interventions version 5. 1. 0[updated March 2011][EB/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org.
  • 4HIGGINS J P T, GREEN S. Cochrane handbook for sys-tematic reviews of interventions version 5. 0. 0[updated February 2008][EB/OL]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
  • 5HIGGINS J P T, THOMPSON S G. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis[J]. Stat Med, 2002, 21(11): 1539-1558.
  • 6CONNOLLY M J, BOYD M, BROAD J B, et al. The aged residential care healthcare utilization study(ARCHUS): a multidisciplinary, cluster randomized controlled trial designed to reduce acute avoidable hospitalizations from long-term care facilities[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2015, 16(1): 49-55. [本文引用:8].
  • 7MILOS V, REKMAN E, BONDESSON A, et al. Improving the quality of pharmacotherapy in elderly primary care patients through medication reviews: a randomised controlled study[J]. Drugs Aging, 2013, 30(4): 235-246.
  • 8ALLARD J, HéBERT R, RIOUX M, et al. Efficacy of a clinical medication review on the number of potentially inappropriate prescriptions prescribed for community-dwelling elderly people[J]. CMAJ, 2001, 164(9): 1291-1296.
  • 9COLEMAN E A, GROTHAUS L C, SANDHU N, et al. Chronic care clinics: a randomized controlled trial of a new model of primary care for frail older adults[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc, 1999, 47(7): 775-783.
  • 10ZARROUK M, HOLST J, MALINA M, et al. The importance of socioeconomic factors for compliance and outcome at screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm in 65-year-old men[J]. J Vasc Surg, 2013, 58(1): 50-55.

引证文献9

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部