垂直型和水平型对外直接投资的生产率门槛——基于中国企业层面微观数据的研究被引量：15

Threshold Effects in the Productivity between Vertical and Horizontal Outward Investment:Based on the Chinese Firms Micro Data

原文传递

导出

摘要现有国际投资理论主要是研究发达国家企业的对外投资行为,认为企业对外直接投资必须具备一定的垄断优势,反而低估了发展中国家企业的对外投资能力。本文在理论建模中放弃了要素密集度同质化的假设,将对外直接投资分为水平型和垂直型,证明了垂直型对外投资的生产率门槛要低于水平型对外直接投资,发展中国家企业有更多机会从事垂直型对外直接投资。进一步采用中国企业微观层面数据的实证检验后发现,目前中国企业对外投资实际上偏重成本导向,对外投资并不像出口一样存在着"生产率悖论",其生产率要显著高于无对外投资企业。同时,实证检验还进一步证实了理论模型中的假说,即垂直型比水平型对外投资有着更低的生产率门槛,这为我国政府制定相关政策推动企业集群式"走出去"提供了理论依据。 The existing international investment theories mainly focus on the outward investment behavior from developed country, which emphasize certain firm-specific monopoly advantage; thereby they underestimate the capability of outward investment from developing country. This paper rejected the ＂homogenous factor intensity＂ hypothesis in the model, divided the types into horizontal and vertical outward investment and tested whetherif productivity of vertical outward investment is much lower than horizontal outward investment. Furthermore the paper made an empirical researchusing the Chinese firm level data to prove that China＇s outward investments actually are cost driven. The productivity paradox doesn＇t hold for outward investment, which means the productivity of investment firms is much higher than non-investment firms. It also concluded that the vertical outward investment has lower entry barrier than horizontal, which gave some policy implication for encouraging china＇s firms to go global.

作者韩剑

机构地区南京大学经济学院

出处《中国经济问题》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期38-50,共13页 China Economic Studies

基金国家自然科学基金项目(项目编号71103083)资助

关键词垂直型对外直接投资水平型对外直接投资生产率门槛 vertical outward investment horizontal outward investment productivity entry barrier

分类号 F279.2 [经济管理—企业管理] F832.6 [经济管理—金融学] F224 [经济管理—国民经济]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献23

1Aw B., and Y. Lee, 2008, "Firm Heterogeneity and Location Choice of Taiwan Residents Multinationals," Journal of Interna- tional Economics, 76 (2) : 403-415.
2Berman N., and J. H6ricourt, 2010, "Financial Factors and the Margins of Trade: Evidence from Cross-Country Firm- Level Data," Journal of Development Economics, 93 (2) : 206-217.
3Eaton J., S. Kortum, and F. Kramarz, 2004, "Discussing Trade : Firms, Industries and Export Destinations," American Economics Review, 94 ( 2 ) : 150-154.
4Engel D., and V. Procher, 2012, "Export, FDI and Firm Productivity," Applied Economics, 44(15) :1931-1940.
5Girma S., R. Kneller, and M. Pisu, 2005, "Exports versus FDI: An Empirical Test," Review of World Economics, 141 (2) : 193-218.
6Hayakawa K., and T. Matsuura,2013, "Heterogeneous Impact of Trade Liberalization on Vertical FDI: Evidence from Japanese Finn-Level Data," Discussion Papers 13020, Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI).
7Head K., and J. Ries, 2003, "Heterogeneity and the Foreign Direct Investment versus Exports Decision of Japanese Manufacturers," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 17 : 448-467.
8Helpman E., M. Melitz, and S. Yeaple,2004, "Export versus FDI with Heterogeneous Firms," American Economic Re- view,94 : 300-316.
9Jung Hur, and Hea-Jung Hyun, 2010, '" Who Goes Where and How? Firm Heterogeneity in the Choice of FDI Type and Location," Working Papers 1105, Research Institute for Market Economy, Sogang University.
10LevinsohnJ., and A. Petrin, 2003, "Estimating Production Functions Using Input to Control for Unobservable," Review of Economic Studies, 70(2) :317-341.

二级参考文献150

1蒋冠宏,蒋殿春.中国对发展中国家的投资——东道国制度重要吗?[J].管理世界,2012,28(11):45-56. 被引量：265
2Chen, M. , Moore, M. Location decision of heterogeneous multi- national finns. Journal of International Economics, 2010, 80 (2) :188-199.
3Feenstra, R, Kee H.L. Export variety and country productivi- ty:estimating the monopolistic competition model with endoge- nous productivity. Journal of International Economics,2008,74 (2) :500-518.
4Greene W. H. Econometric Analysis. New York:Prentice Hall Press ,7th Edition,2008.
5Helpman, E. , Melitz, M. , Yeaple, S. Export versus FDI with heterogeneous? American Economic Review, 2004, 94 (1): 300-316.
6Levinsohn, J. , Petrin, A. Estimating production functions u- sing inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 2003, 70(2) :317-342.
7McFadden D. Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior. P. Zarembka, ed. Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
8Melitz, M. The impact of trade on intra -industry realloca- tions and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 2003, 71 (6) :1695-1725.
9Yeaple, S. Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U. S. mul- tinational activity: an empirical analysis. Journal of Interna- tional Economics, 2009, 78(2) :206-215.
10Amiti, M. , and J. Konings, "Trade Liberalization, Intermediate Inputs, and Productivity: Evi- dence from Indonesia", American Economic Review 2007, 97 (5), 1611--1638.