期刊文献+

“一致政府”下的否决者:台湾地区立法机构审议两岸服务贸易协议探析 被引量:1

Veto Players in Unified Government:A Study of Legislative Deliberation of Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement of Taiwan Province
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究通过整合"否决者"与"否决点"的理论概念,分析台湾地区立法机构审议两岸服贸协议的具体过程。当台湾朝野政党的政策立场分歧强度提高时,在野阵营会通过党团协商与议事抗争策略,削弱国民党在立法机构程序委员会和委员会阶段的议程设定优势,使立法决策的多数决原则移向共识决原则,从而将立法过程的议程节点转变为立法否决点。因此,国民党当局虽然同时掌控台湾的立法系统和行政系统,但其立法运作却呈现类似"分立政府"下的低立法效能困境。 This paper studied the deliberation process in Cross-Strait Service Trade Agreement in the legislature of Taiwan province by employing the theoretic concepts of "veto players" and "veto points. " When policy disputes between the ruling party and opposition party increase, the opposition party will reduce the advantage of Kuomintang in agenda-setting in the procedure committee as well as the general committee of the Legislative Yuan in Taiwan province through the strategies of party negotiation and procedural confrontation. By so doing, it replaces the majority rule with the consensus rule, and turns the agenda-setting points into the veto points. Although the Kuomintang controls both legislative and executive organs in Taiwan province, the so-called "unified government" has demonstrated it8 ineffectiveness, which is a phenomenon usually appearing in the "divided government. "
作者 吴维旭 林冈
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期15-23,共9页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 一致政府 否决者 否决点 议程阻绝 unified government veto players veto points agenda obstructionism
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1Gary WCox and SamuelKernell. Introduction: Governing a Divided Era. Inthe Politics of Divided Govern- ment, Ed. Gary W. Cox and Samuel Kernell. Boulder. CO: Westview Press, 1991.
  • 2Paul J. Quirk and Bruce Nesmith. "Explaining Deadlock: DomesticPolicymaking in the Bush Presidency. " In New Perspective on American Politics,Ed. Lawrence C. Dodd and Calvin Jillson. Washington, DC:CQ Press,1994,p. 191-211.
  • 3R. WCobbs and M. H. Ross. Cultural Strategies of Agenda Denial. KA: TheUniversity of Kansas,1997.
  • 4蔡荣祥,陈宏铭.《“总统国会制”的一致政府与宪政运作:以马英九“总统”第一任期为例》,《东吴政治学报》2012年第4期:第135页.
  • 5李凤玉.《"总统"与其政党的关系:法国与台湾的比较》,载于《党政关系与"国会"运作》,台北:五南图书出版公司,2011年,第205-206页.
  • 6R. D. McKelvey. "Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Somelmplications for Agenda Control. " Journal of Economic Theory, 1976,12 : pp. 472- 482.
  • 7GeorgeTsebelis. Veto Players : How Political Institutions Work, Princeton University Press, 2002, p. 36.
  • 8艾伦·伊莫加特.《制度,否决点与政策结果》,载《比较政治学:理论,案例与方法》,北京:北京大学出版社,2008年,第213-220页.
  • 9G. Bonoli. "Political Institutions, Veto Points, and the Process of Welfare StateAdaptation. " In The New Politics of the Welfare State ,Ed. P. Pierson Oxford: OxfordUniversity Press,2001 ,p. 238-264.
  • 10GeorgeTsebelis. Veto Players : How Political Institutions Work, Princeton University Press, 2002, p. 19- 20.

二级参考文献35

  • 1郝明义.《我们剩不到二十四小时了》,参见http://opinion.cw.eom.tw/blog/profile/88/article/418.
  • 2黄筱筠.《民进党主张订定:与中国缔结协议监督委员会》,中评社台北6月12日电.
  • 3《“立法院”第8届第3会期第1次临时会第2次会议议事录》,《“立法院”公报》,第102卷第47期,第84页.
  • 4《服贸协议王郁琦:望逐条讨论整案表决》,中评社台北6月22日电.
  • 5《"立法院"第8届第3会期第2次临时会第1次会议议事录》,《"立法院"公报》,第102卷第48期,第467页.
  • 6许宗力.《行政命令授权明确性问题之研究》,载于《台大法学论丛》,第19卷第2期,1990年,第59页.
  • 7许宗力.《论"国会"对行政命令之监督》,许宗力著.《法与国家权力》,台北:月旦杂志出版社,1993年第二版,第27页.
  • 8黄昭元.《"国会"改革五法简介》,台湾《台湾本土法学》,1999年第1期,第182页,第184页.
  • 9黄筱筠.《绿呛声:服贸不逐条审,临时会有冲突》,中评社台北7月16日电.
  • 10黄筱筠.《民间团体呼吁:勿草率审查服贸协议》,中评社台北7月9日电.

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部