期刊文献+

古典政治哲学视野下的“亲亲相隐”问题研究——以哲学与政治的关系为中心 被引量:1

“The Mutual Concealment Between Father and Son in Judicial Case”from the Perspective of Classical Political Philosophy:Focusing on the Relationship Between Philosophy and Politics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 哲学与政治以及更为根本的哲人与民人关系问题,既是中西古典政治哲学的基本主题和共同信仰,同时也是认识中西古典政治哲学的基本方法,虽然在具体关系的勘定上,儒家政治哲学与古希腊政治哲学之间存有较大区别。以此观之,孔子的"直"案,体现的是圣人为不同文化政治身位的人设置相应的礼法规范的立法行动。孟子的"舜"案,生动地展现了儒家哲人王与现实政治的紧张关系,"窃父而逃"宣告了圣人要告别作为"政治动物"的"在世之在"而重返神圣纯粹的光明世界;"象"案,为我们演示的是经与权或者文与实的二重辩证法。在《游叙弗伦》中,苏格拉底盛赞游叙弗伦的状告行为,但却否定了后者诉诸的希腊新神传统并挑战了其哲学能力。 The relationships between philosophy and politics and more basically the philosopher and the vulgar behind them are the main themes and common beliefs of classical Chinese and Western political philosophy, which are simultaneously the basic approaches to the understanding of classical Chinese and Western political philosophy itself. At the concrete level, however, there are great differences between Confucian political philosophy and ancient Greek political philosophy. From this perspective, the case of "Zhi" represents the ethical-legal norms of the legislation of Confucius for people with different cultural-political statuses. The case of "Shun" advanced by Mencius vividly reveals the tension between the Confucianism philosophical king and politics. Shun claims that he intends to say goodbye to be a "political animal" as "being in the world" and return to the bright place with holy and pure properties; The case of "Xiang" puts forward the dual dialectics of the principled norm and flexibility. In Euthyphro, Socrates highly praises Euthyphro's lawsuit against his father but denies the New Greek deity tradition Euthyphro resorted to and challenges his philosophical faculty.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期42-51,共10页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基金 国家社科基金项目"中国古代家本主义伦理学及其当代意义研究"(11CZX055)
关键词 哲学 政治 哲人 民人 亲亲相隐 philosophy politics philosopher the vulgar the Mutual Concealment between Father and Son in Judicial Cases
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1王弘治.《论语》“亲亲相隐”章重读——兼论刘清平、郭齐勇诸先生之失[J].浙江学刊,2007(1):93-98. 被引量:22
  • 2马承源.《上海博物馆藏战国楚竹书(四)》[M].上海古籍出版社,2004年12月..
  • 3黎翔凤.《管子校注》,北京:中华书局,2004年,第1249-1250页.
  • 4李存山.《读楚简<忠信之道>及其他》[J].中国哲学,1999,(20).
  • 5亚里士多德.《形而上学》983a11-13,苗力田译,载《亚里士多德全集》第7卷,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993年,第32页.
  • 6亚里士多德.《政治学》1282b15-16,颜一译,载《亚里士多德全集》第9卷,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994年,第98页.
  • 7亚里士多德.《政治学》1265a1-2,颜一译,载《亚里士多德全集》第9卷,北京:中国人民大学出版社,1994年,第44页.
  • 8deuteron ploun,《斐多》99c9-d1.
  • 9katheramenoi,《斐多》114c2-3.
  • 10施特劳斯.《简评迈蒙尼德和阿尔法拉比的政治学》,载阿尔法拉比.《柏拉图的哲学》,程志敏译,上海:华东师范大学出版社,2006年,第203页.

共引文献205

同被引文献5

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部