摘要
目的:对山豆根及其伪品北豆根、木蓝根、滇豆根、百两金、胡枝子根、苦甘草、千斤拔进行对比鉴别,为临床合理用药提供依据。方法:从基源、产地分布、性状、显微、理化、成分、功效与应用几方面进行对比鉴别。结果:山豆根、北豆根、木蓝根、滇豆根、百两金、胡枝子根、苦甘草、千斤拔从基源、产地分布、性状、显微、理化、成分、功效与应用几方面均有区别,临床用药不可混淆。结论:山豆根、北豆根、木蓝根、滇豆根、百两金、胡枝子根、苦甘草、千斤拔基源产地不同,性状显微不同,成分有别,功用各有所长,不尽一致,不能冒充山豆根使用,应加以区分、鉴别,以保证临床合理用药安全有效。
To analyze and identifyShanDouGen(Radixsophoraetonkinensis) and its counterfeits BeiDouGen (Rhizoma Menispermi), MuLanGen (Magnolia grandiflora Root), DianDouGen [Beesia calthifolia(Maxin)], BaiLiangJin(Asiaticcrispa),HuZhiZiGen(LespedezabicolorTurez),KuGanCao(SophoraealopecuroidesL) and QianJinBa(FlemingiaFruticulosa) and provide reference for its clinical application. Methods: Analyzing and identi-fication was made from base resources, origins, distributions of production, properties, microscopic features, physi-cal and chemical characters, compositions, efficacy and application. Results:ShanDouGenand its counterfeits were different from each other in base resources, origins, distributions of production, properties, microscopic features, compositions, and application. And the counterfeit species can't replaceShanDouGen. Conclusion:ShanDouGenis different from its counterfeits, we should distinguish and identify them to ensure its clinical application safe and ef-fective.
出处
《西部中医药》
2015年第4期21-24,共4页
Western Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
山豆根
伪品
鉴别
ShanDouGen
counterfeit
identification