期刊文献+

L~﹡a~﹡b~﹡色度系统评估硫酸镍斑贴试验结果分析

Analysis of the evaluation of the Lab chromatic system on the result of nickel sulfate patch test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解硫酸镍斑贴试验不同结果对L*a*b*色度系统变化的影响。方法:对38名健康志愿者进行人体皮肤封闭型硫酸镍斑贴试验。将2.5%硫酸镍斑试器用胶带贴敷在受试者上背部,同时设空白对照,封包24h后揭去斑试物。分别于试验前(D0)、揭去斑试物后0.5h(D1)、24h(D2)对皮肤反应结果进行临床评估及皮肤颜色L*a*b*值测定。结果:38例受试者中8例在D1和(或)D2时临床评估为阳性。镍斑贴试验阴性组、空白对照组受试者D1、D2时皮肤色度L*值、b*值及a*值较D0均无明显变化;斑贴试验阳性组D1、D2时皮肤色度a*值分别为10.64±1.90和13.22±1.92,较D0时皮肤色度a*值7.80±2.49明显升高(P=0.000)。结论:硫酸镍斑贴诱发的接触性皮炎模型中,L*a*b色度系统a*值能反映皮肤发生炎症后的红斑变化,可作为评估接触性皮炎的客观评价参数。 Objective To understand the effects of the different results of nickel sulfate patch test on the L*a *b *chromatic system. Methods The occlusive human nickel sulfate patch test was in 38 healthy volunteers.The 2.5%nickel sulfate patch test was tapped on the back of the volunteers for 24 hours.Measurements including clinical evaluation and the determination of L*a *b *were made before patch occlusion and 0.5h(D1),24h(D2) after patch removal, respectively. Results In all 38 subjects, 8 cases were judged positive at D1 and (or) D2.There was no significant difference between positive group an negative group in the values of L**b *and a*at D1 and D2. The a*values of positive goup at D1, D2 were 10.64±1.90,13.22±1.92 respectively, which both were higher than the value 7.80±2.49 before patch test (P=0.000). Conclusion In the contact dermatitis model inducing by nickel sulfate, the a*val?ue of the L*a *b *chromatic system can reflect erythematic changes after skin inflammation, showing a*value maybe the objective evaluation parameter to evaluate contact dermatitis.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2015年第8期38-40,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 硫酸镍 斑贴试验 皮肤色度 nickel sulfate patch test skin chroma
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献29

  • 1赵辨.化妆品皮炎与化妆品管理[J].临床皮肤科杂志,1994,23(1):38-41. 被引量:15
  • 2李毅民,郭宝岚,刘景兰,刘清,张月,治洪,张丽霞,张少平,孔建.进口特殊用途化妆品的毒理学试验[J].毒理学杂志,2006,20(3):203-204. 被引量:1
  • 3方丽华,王侠生.化妆品皮肤不良反应临床及致病因素研究[J].中国皮肤性病学杂志,1997,11(1):5-6. 被引量:16
  • 4[1]Clarys P, Alewaeters K, Lambrecht R, et al. Skin color measurements: comparison between three instruments: the Chromameter(R), the Derma Spectrometer(R) and the Mexameter(R)[J]. Skin Res Technol, 2000, 6(4): 230-238.
  • 5[2]Corcuff P, Pierard GE. Skin imaging: state of the art at the dawn of the year 2000[J]. Curr Probl Dermatol, 1998, 26(1):1-11.
  • 6[3]Alaluf S, Atkins D, Barrett K, et al. The impact of epidermal melanin on objective measurements of human skin colour [J].Pigment Cell Res, 2002, 15(2): 119-126.
  • 7[4]Andreassi L, Flori L. Practical applications of cutaneous colorimetry[J]. Clin Dermatol, 1995, 13(4): 369-373.
  • 8de Jongh CM,Jakasa I,Verberk MM,et al.Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate[J].Br J Dermatol,2006,154(4):651-657.
  • 9Geier J,Uter W,Pirker C,et al.Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate(SLS)is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contaet allergens as allergic or irritant[J].Contact Dermatitis,2003,48(2):99-107.
  • 10Loffler H,Happle R.Influence of climatic conditions on the irritant patch test with sodium lauryl sulphate[J].Acta Derm Venereol,2003,83(5):338-341.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部