期刊文献+

不同水陆生境下入侵种喜旱莲子草与土著种莲子草表型变异和细胞渗透势调节能力的比较研究 被引量:3

Comparisons of Morphological Variation and Cellular Osmotic Potential Adjustment between Invasive Species Alternanthera philoxeroides and its Native Congener A. sessilis under Different Water Treatments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 喜旱莲子草(Alternanthera philoxeroides(Mart.)Griseb.)能成功入侵不同水陆生境,而其同属近缘种莲子草(A.sessilis(Linn.)DC.)适于生长在潮湿的陆地环境中。为揭示两物种生态幅差异的机理及与其入侵潜力的关系,我们在模拟不同水陆生境的同质园环境下,比较了喜旱莲子草和莲子草的形态特征、细胞渗透势变异状况和细胞内溶质物质合成相关基因(蛋氨酸合成酶基因)的表达水平。结果表明:喜旱莲子草对环境变异更敏感,表型变异幅度更大,具有更有效的渗透势调节能力;蛋氨酸合成酶基因在喜旱莲子草进入水生环境的早期阶段表现出短暂上调的特殊表达趋势。这说明有效的细胞渗透势调节机制与喜旱莲子草对不同水陆生境的广泛适应性和较强的表型可塑性能力可能有关,从而帮助其在不同生境中成功入侵。 To understand the mechanisms underpinning the invasion of Alternanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. in diverse water regimes, we compared its morphological traits, osmotic potential and methionine synthase (MS) gene expression with its native congener A. sessilis (Linn.) DC., which mainly occurs in moist terrestrial habitats in China. Results showed that A. philoxeroides exhibited greater phenotypic plasticity and possessed a more effective mechanism for osmotic adjustment than that of A. sessilis. The MS gene exhibited an ' up- down' expression pattern in A. philoxeroides, its mRNA levels increased during the first 3 hours of flooding treatments and then fell rapidly thereafter. Thus, higher flexibility in the internal environment and gene expression adjustment may play an important role in the rapid responses of A. philoxeroides to water regime changes, which are associated with its invasiveness.
作者 高乐旋
出处 《植物科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第2期195-202,共8页 Plant Science Journal
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31300189) 辰山科研专项项目(G142431)
关键词 喜旱莲子草 莲子草 表型可塑性 细胞渗透势 基因表达 Altemanthera philoxeroides (Mart.) Griseb. Alternanthera sessilis (Linn.) DC. Phenotypic plasticity Cellular osmotic potential Gene expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1李博,徐炳声,陈家宽.从上海外来杂草区系剖析植物入侵的一般特征[J].生物多样性,2001,9(4):446-457. 被引量:224
  • 2Pimentel D, McNair S, Janecka J, Wightman J, Simmonds C, O'Connell C, Wong E, Russel L, Zero J, Aquino T, TsomondoT. Economic and en- vironmental threats of alien plant, animal, and mi- crobe invasions [ J ], Agr Ecosyst Environ, 2001, 84 ( 1 ) ~ 1-20.
  • 3Lodge DM. Biological invasions-lessons for ecolo- gy[J]. Trends Ecol Evol, 1993, 8(4) : 133-137.
  • 4Williamson M, Fitter A. The varying success of in- vaders[J]. Ecology, 1996, 77(6): 1661-1666.
  • 5王坤,杨继,陈家宽.近缘种比较研究在植物入侵生态学中的应用[J].生物多样性,2009,17(4):353-361. 被引量:20
  • 6Liu H, Stiling P, Pemberton RW. Does enemy re- lease matter for invasive plants? evidence from a comparison of insect herbivore damage among in- vasive, non-invasive and native congeners [ J ]. Biol Invasions, 2007, 9(7). 773-781.
  • 7Mcalpine KG, Jesson LK, Kubien DS. Photosyn- thesis and water-use efficiency= a comparison be- tween invasive (exotic) and non-invasive (native) species[J]. Aust Ecol, 2008, 33( 1)= 10-19.
  • 8Burns JH. A comparison of invasive and non-inva- sive dayflowers (Commelinaceae) across experi- mental nutrient and water gradients [ J ]. Divers Oistrib, 2004, 10(5-6)= 387-397.
  • 9Burns JH, Winn AA. A comparison of plastic re- sponses to competition by invasive and non-inva- sive congeners in the commelinaceae[ J~. Biol In- vasions, 2006, 8( 4)= 797-807.
  • 10Graebner RC, Callaway RM, Montesinos D. Inva- sive species grows faster, competes better, and shows greater evolution toward increased seed size and growth than exotic non-invasive conge- ners[Jl. Plant Ecol, 2012, 213(4)= 545-553.

二级参考文献46

共引文献452

同被引文献89

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部