期刊文献+

三种评分在心脏术后接受连续性肾脏替代治疗患者预后评价中的应用 被引量:2

Application of three scoring systems in evaluation of prognosis of patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨多器官功能障碍评分(MODS)、简化急性生理评分Ⅱ(SAPSⅡ)和血管活性肌力药物评分(VIS)对心脏术后行连续性肾脏替代治疗(CRRT)患者预后评价的预测作用。方法调查2010年11月—2014年6月在上海市胸科医院外科监护室行CRRT的心脏术后成年患者,根据出院时治疗结果分为存活组和死亡组。分别对所有患者在手术后第1日和CRRT前1日进行病情严重程度评分,并以受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUCROC)大小衡量各评分系统对患者预后的预测能力。结果 32例心脏术后急性肾损伤(AKI)接受CRRT的患者被纳入该研究,其中9例存活,23例死亡,死亡率为71.9%。死亡组患者无论是在术后第1日还是在CRRT前1日的MODS、SAPSⅡ和VIS的3种评分均显著高于存活组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05或P<0.01)。术后第1日VIS、CRRT前1日MODS、CRRT前1日SAPSⅡ和CRRT前1日VIS的4个评分,AUCROC分别为0.821、0.816、0.800和0.768,两两之间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。高VIS组在术后90 d存活率明显低于低VIS组,且术后低心排量综合征和再次剖胸探查发生率更高。结论术后第1日VIS、CRRT前1日MODS、CRRT前1日SAPSⅡ和CRRT前1日VIS都能较好地预测心脏术后行CRRT治疗患者的预后,术后第1日VIS作为早期指标更优。高VIS与不良预后相关。 Objective To evaluate the prediction of prognosis of patients undergoing the continuous renal replacement therapy( CRRT) after cardiac surgery by the multiple organ dysfunction score( M O DS), simplified acute physiology score Ⅱ( SAPS Ⅱ), and vasoactive-inotropic score( V IS).Methods Data of patients undergoing CRRTafter the cardiac surgery fromN ovember, 2010 to June, 2014 in the Surgical Intensive Care U nit of Shanghai Chest H ospital were collected.Patients were divided into the survival group and death group according to the result of treatment.The severity of disease of all patients was evaluated one day after surgery and one day before CRRT.The prediction of prognosis of patients by 3 scoring systems was evaluated by the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve( AU CRO C).Results A total of 32 adult patients with acute kidney injury( AKI) who underwent CRRTafter the cardiac surgery were enrolled.Among them, 9patients survived and 23 patients died.The mortality rate was 71.9%.The scores of M O DS, SAPSⅡ, and V IS of the death group one day after surgery and one day before CRRTwere significantly higher than those of the survival group.The differences were statistically significant( P〈0.05 or P〈0.01).AU CRO Cof V IS one day after surgery and M O DS, SAPS Ⅱ, and V IS one day before CRRTwere 0.821, 0.816, 0.800, and 0.768 respectively.The differences of any two of themwere not statistically significant( P〉0.05).The survival rate of the group with high V IS 90 d after surgery was significantly lower than that of the group with lowV IS.The incidences of lowcardiac output syndrome( LCO S) and exploratory thoracotomy of the group with high V IS were higher than those of the group with lowV IS.Conclusion V IS one day after surgery and M O DS, SAPSⅡ, and VIS one day before CRRTcan ideally predict the prognosis of patients undergoing CRRTafter cardiac surgery.V IS one day after surgery is the best early index.H igh V IS is correlated with the poor prognosis.
出处 《上海交通大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期540-544,548,共6页 Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University:Medical Science
基金 上海市胸科医院科技发展基金课题(2014YZDC20600)~~
关键词 危重病评分系统 心脏手术 连续性肾脏替代治疗 预后 受试者工作特征曲线 severity scoring systems cardiac surgery continuous renal replacement therapy prognosis receiver operator characteristic curve
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Mao H, Katz N, Ariyanon W, et al. Cardiac surgery-assoc-ialec!acute kidney injury[J]. Cardiorenal Med, 2013 , 3(3) : 178 - 199.
  • 2Kumar AB, Suneja M, Bay man EO,et al. Association betweenpostoperative acute kidney injury and duration of cardiopulmonarybypass : a meta-analysis[ J]. J Cardiothorac Vase Anesth , 2012 , 26(1); 64 -69.
  • 3Sanil Y, Aggarwal S. Vasoactive-inotropic score after pediatric liearttransplant : a marker of adverse outcome [ J ]. Pediatr Transplant,2013,17(6) ; 567 -572.
  • 4Markgraf R, Deutsckinoff G,Pientka L, et al. Comparison of acutephysiology and chronic health evaluation II and III and simplifiedacute physiology score II: a prospective cohort study evaluating thesemethods to predict outcome in a German interdisciplinary intensivecare unit[ J]. Crit Care Med,2000,28 (1) : 26 - 33.
  • 5伍民生,赵晓琴,陈强.急性生理学和慢性健康状况评分Ⅱ/Ⅲ预测ICU中急性肾损伤合并多器官功能障碍综合征患者预后的比较[J].中国呼吸与危重监护杂志,2011,10(2):154-157. 被引量:4
  • 6Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physi-ology score ( SAPS II) based on a European/North American multi-center study[J]. JAMA, 1993, 270(24) : 2957 -2963.
  • 7Marshall JC , Cook DJ, Christou NV , et al. Multiple organ dysfunc-tion score : a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome [ J ].Crit Care Med, 1995, 23(10) : 1638 -1652.
  • 8Gaies MG, Gurney JG, Yen AH , et al. Vasoactive-inotropic scoreas a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmo-nary bypass[ J]. Pediatr Crit Care Med, 2010,11(2) : 234 - 238.
  • 9中国心力衰竭诊断和治疗指南2014[J].中华心血管病杂志,2014,42(2):98-122. 被引量:4664
  • 10Parissis JT, Rafouli-Stergiou P, Stasinos V , et al. Inotropes in car-diac patients : update 2011 [ J ]. Current Opinion in Critical Care ,2010, 16(5) : 432 -441.

二级参考文献13

共引文献4666

同被引文献25

  • 1TEIXEIRA C, GARZOTTO F, PICCINNI P, et al. Fluid balance and urine volume are independent predictors of mortality in acute kidney injury[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(1): R14.
  • 2SCHEFOLD J C, VON HAEHLING S, PSCHOWSKI R, et al. The effect of continuous versus intermittent renal replacement therapy on the outcome of critically ill patients with acute renal failure (CONVINT): a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Crit Care, 2014, 18(1): R11.
  • 3GRANADO C D, MACEDO E, SOROKO S, et al. Anticoagulation, delivered dose and outcomes in CRRT: The program to improve care in acute renal disease (PICARD)[J]. Hemodial Int, 2014, 18(3): 641-649.
  • 4KASHANI K, AL-KHAFAJI A, ARDILES T, et al. Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury[J]. Critical care, 2013, 17(1): 1-12.
  • 5GERENT A, ALMEIDA J, ALMEIDA E, et al. Base deficit and SOFA score are predictive factors of early acute kidney injury in oncologic surgical patients[J]. Critical Care, 2015, 19(Suppl 1): P297.
  • 6BELLOMO R, HEGARTY C, STORY D, et al. Association between a chloride-liberal vs chloride-restrictive intravenous fluid administration strategy and kidney injury in critically ill adults[J]. Jama, 2012, 308(15): 1566-1572.
  • 7GUPTA A K, RAJ S, CHAUDHARY P, et al. A prospective comparative study of bedside index for assessing severity in acute pancreatitis, APACHE II and computed tomography severity index scoring in predicting outcome in acute pancreatitis[J]. Hellenic Journal of Surgery, 2015, 87(6): 473-478.
  • 8VANMASSENHOVE J, VANHOLDER R, NAGLER E, et al. Urinary and serum biomarkers for the diagnosis of acute kidney injury: an in-depth review of the literature[J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2013, 28(2): 254-273.
  • 9MICA L, RUFIBACH K, KEEL M, et al. The risk of early mortality of polytrauma patients associated to ISS, NISS, APACHE II values and prothrombin time[J]. J Trauma Manag Outcomes, 2013, 7:6.
  • 10ROCCO M, MONTINI L, ALESSANDRI E, et al. Risk factors for acute kidney injury in critically ill patients receiving high intravenous doses of colistin methanesulfonate and/or other nephrotoxic antibiotics: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Crit Care, 2013, 17(4): R174.

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部