期刊文献+

老年人平衡能力测试表评估跌倒风险的信效度研究 被引量:7

The reliability and validity of balancing ability test for elder people
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对老年人平衡能力测试表评估跌倒风险进行信效度检验。方法用分层随机抽样的方法选择居住在秦皇岛市城市社区的60岁及以上老年人1600例,对过去1年的跌倒和平衡能力进行调查。结果老年人平衡能力测试表总Cronbach’α系数为0.910。各条目得分与总得分之间的相关系数在0.621~0.781之间,相关性有统计学意义( P<0.01)。无跌倒老年人得分明显低于有跌倒老年人得分(1.67±3.60 vs 4.00±6.32),差异有统计学意义(t=4.545,P=0.000)。老年人平衡能力测试表识别跌倒的ROC曲线下面积为0.633(95%CI:0.584~0.681,P=0.000)。当界值为1时,测试表预测效度的综合评价指标Youden指数最高为0.221,此时灵敏度为0.599,特异度为0.622。结论老年人跌倒平衡测试表是一种简单、方便、有效的评估工具,其评估老年人跌倒风险的信度和效度较好,适合社区卫生服务人员用以评估老年人的跌倒危险性。 Objective To explore the reliability and validity of balancing ability test for elder people.Methods Stratified random sampling was applied in this study.A total of 1600 elder adults with age 60 years and over from communities of Qinhuangdao were recruited.The fall event and balancing ability during the last 1 year were investigated.Results Cronbach’αcoefficient was 0.910 according to the balancing ability test.Pearson’ s correlation coefficient ranged between 0.621 and 0.781 ( P〈0.01).The scores of older people without falls were lower than the scores of older people with falls (1.67 ±3.60 vs 4.00 ± 6.32, t=4.545, P=0.000).The area under the curve was 0.633 (95%CI:0.584-0.681, P=0.000).When the cutoff value was 1, the maximum Youden index was 0.221, and the sensitivity and specificity were 0.599 and 0.622, respectively.Conclusion The balancing ability test for elder people was a simple, convenient, and safe assessment method with good reliability and validity, which could be applied for the fall risk assessment for the elder people in the community.
出处 《中国骨质疏松杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期415-417,共3页 Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis
基金 国家"十二五"科技支撑项目"老年病防治研究"子课题"老年跌倒损伤防控研究"(2012BAI10B01)
关键词 跌倒 老年人平衡能力测试表 信度 效度 Fall Balancing ability test table for elder people Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献28

  • 1张发强.中国社会体育现状调查结果报告[J].体育科学,1999,19(1):4-7. 被引量:522
  • 2陈君,石凤英,李泽萍,钱颖.预测老年人跌倒危险的平衡和步态功能性评定研究进展[J].中国康复医学杂志,2004,19(9):713-715. 被引量:55
  • 3覃朝晖,于普林,乌正赉.老年人跌倒研究的现状及进展[J].中华老年医学杂志,2005,24(9):711-714. 被引量:163
  • 4Peden M, McGee K, Sharma G. The Injury Chart Book: A Graphical Overview of the Global Burden of Injuries [M]. Ge- neva: World Health Organization, 2002: 43-50.
  • 5Wrisley DM, Marchetti GF, Kuharsky DK, et al. Reliability, in- ternal consistency, and validity of data obtained with the func- tional gait assessment [J]. Phys Ther, 2004, 84(10): 906-918.
  • 6Wrisley DM, Kumar NA. Functional gait assessment: concur- rent, discriminative, and predictive validity in communi- ty-dwelling older adults [J]. Phys Ther, 2010, 90(5): 761-773.
  • 7Walker ML, Austin AG, Banke GM, et al. Reference group data for the functional gait assessment [J]. Phys Ther, 2007, 87: 1468-1477.
  • 8Leddy AL, Crowner BE, Earhart GM. Functional gait assess- ment and balance evaluation system test: reliability, validity, sensitivity, and specificity for identifying individuals with Par- kinson disease who fall [J]. Phys Ther, 2011, 91(1 ): 102-113.
  • 9Thieme H, Ritschel C, Zange C. Reliability and validity of the functional gait assessment (German version) in subacute stroke patients [J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2009, 90(9): 1565-1570.
  • 10Masud T, Morris RO. Epidemiology of falls [J]. Age Aging, 2001, 30(4): 3-7.

共引文献128

同被引文献91

引证文献7

二级引证文献42

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部