期刊文献+

肌力与骨量的相关性研究进展 被引量:4

Research progress in the relationship between muscle force and bone mass
下载PDF
导出
摘要 骨量与应力的关系早己被大量的生物力学研究所证实,其中肌肉组织是引起最大动态性骨组织载荷与应变的因素,通过肌力与骨量的关系来研究骨质疏松症具有重要意义。目前,已经有较多的肌力与骨量之间的关系研究,但是对于肌力与骨量间的作用机制及对其影响因素的系统论述还较少,为了更好地了解肌力与骨量之间的关系在骨质疏松发生发展过程中的影响,本文对肌力与骨量相关性作一简要综述。 The relationship between bone mass and stress has been confirmed by most of the biomechanical studies.The muscle is the factor to cause the maximum dynamic loading and the strain of the bone.It is important to study osteoporosis through the relationship between bone mass and stress.Currently, there is a few study on the relationship between bone mass and stress. However, systematic report on the mechanism and influential factors to stress and bone mass is little.In order to better understand the relationship between bone mass and stress during the development of osteoporosis, this paper reviews the relationship between muscle force and bone mass.
出处 《中国骨质疏松杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第4期514-518,共5页 Chinese Journal of Osteoporosis
关键词 骨质疏松症 肌力 骨量 Osteoporosis Muscle force Bone mass
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Fficke O, Beccard R,Semler O, et al. Analyses of muscular mass and function : the impact on bone mineral density and peak muscle mass. Pediatr Nephrnl,2010,25(12) :2393-2400.
  • 2Palmer TB, Jenkins ND, Thompson B J, et al. The relationship between passive stiffness and muscle power output: Influence of muscle cross-sectional area normalization. Muscle Nerve,2014,49 ( 1 ) :69-75.
  • 3Snijders T, Wall BT, Dirks ML, et al. Muscle disuse atrophy is not accompanied by changes in skeletal muscle satellite cell content. Clin Sci(Lond) ,2014,126(8) :557-566.
  • 4Alizadehkhaiyat O, Hawkes DH, Kemp GJ. Muscle strength and its relation-ship with skeletal muscle mass indices as determined by segmental bio-impedance analysis. Eur ] Appl Physiol,2014, 114(1) :177-185.
  • 5Power GA, Dalton BH, Rice CL, et al. Reproducibility of velocity- dependent power:before and after lengthening contractions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2011,36 ( 5 ) : 626-633.
  • 6Fonseca H, Moreira-Goncalves D, Coriolano HJ, et al. Bone quality: the determinants of bone strength and fragility. Sports Med ,2014,44( 1 ) :37-53.
  • 7Dong XN, Shirvaikar M, Wang X. Biomechanical properties and mieroarehi teeture parameters of trabecular bone are correlated with stochastic measures of2D projection images. Bone,2013,56 (2) :327-336.
  • 8Topolinski T, Mazurkiewicz A, Jung S, et al. Microarehitectureparame-ters describe bone structure and its strength better than BMD. Scientific World Journal,2012,5 ( 2 ) : 781.
  • 9Sigurdsen U, Reikeras O, Hoiseth A, et al. Correlations between strength and quantitative computed tomography measurement of callus minerali-zation in experimental tibial fractures. Clin Biomech ( Bristol, Avon) ,2011,26 ( 1 ) :95-100.
  • 10Milovanovic P,Djuric M, Rakocevic Z. Age-dependence of power spectral density and fractal dimension of bone mineralized matrix in atomic force microscope topography images:potential correlates of bone tissue age and bone fragility in female femoral neck trabeculae. J Anat,2012,221 ( 5 ) :427.

同被引文献52

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部