期刊文献+

超声造影鉴别诊断可疑恶性乳腺病灶的囊实性 被引量:3

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of cystic and solid breast lesions with suspicious malignant possibility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨CEUS在可疑恶性乳腺病变囊实性鉴别诊断中的应用价值。方法对277例患者共277个可疑恶性乳腺病灶进行常规超声及CEUS检查,分别做出相应诊断,并与术后病理结果比较。同时进行医师诊断信心分级。结果 277例可疑乳腺病变,CEUS较常规超声能检出更多囊性或囊实性病变(χ2=93.57,P<0.01)。CEUS后诊断者1级诊断信心和2级诊断信心明显升高(P<0.01)。结论在可疑乳腺病变的临床超声诊断中,CEUS有助于病灶囊实性的鉴别及提高临床工作者的诊断信心。 Objective To investigate the application value of CEUS in the differential diagnosis of cystic and solid breast lesions with suspicious malignant breast lesions. Methods A total of 277 patients with 277 focal breast lesions with suspi- cious breast lesions were treated with CEUS and baseline ultrasound (BUS). The radiologist made the diagnosis based on BUS and CEUS separately. The diagnosis was compared with pathology results. Confidence degree was given for each diagnosis. Results CEUS showed more cyst or cystic and solid lesions than BUS (Z2 =93.57, P〈0.05) in breast lesions. The doctor's confidence was higher both in first and second class after CEUS (P〈0.01). Conclusion Compared with BUS, CEUS is helpful in differential diagnosis of cyst or solid breast lesions, and can impr.ove..doctor's confidence in diagnosing suspicious malignant breast diseases.
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期742-745,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 囊实性 造影剂 超声检查 诊断信心 Breast neoplasms Solid-cystic Contrast media Ultrasonography Diagnostic confidence
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献85

共引文献125

同被引文献20

  • 1Uematsu T, Yuen S, Kasami M, et al. Dynamic contrast-en- hanced MR imaging in screening detected mieroealcification lesions of the breast: Is there any value? Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2007, 103(3) :269-281.
  • 2Wan CF, Du J, Fang H, et al. Enhancement patterns and param- eters of breast cancers at contrast-enhanced US: Correlation with prognostic factors. Radiology, 2012, 262(2):450-459.
  • 3Tuncbilek N, Unlu E, Karakas HM, et al. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis with contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance mammography. Breast J, 2003,9(5):403-408.
  • 4Zhao H, Xu R, Ouyang Q, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is helpful in the differentiation of malignant and benign breast le- sions. Eur J Radiol, 2010,73(2) :288-293.
  • 5Zdemir A, Kilic K, Ozdemir H, et al. Contrast-enhanced powerDoppler sonography in breast lesions: Effect on differential diag- nosis after mammography and gray scale sonography. J Ultra- sound Med, 2004,23(2) :183-195; quiz 196 7.
  • 6Orel SG, Kay N, Reynolds C, et al. BI-RADS categorization as a predictor of malignancy. Radiology, 1999,211 (3) : 845-850.
  • 7Stines J. BI-RADS: Use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties. Eur J Radiol, 2007, 61 (2) :224-234.
  • 8Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Eehenique M, et al. Evaluation of breast imaging reporting and data system category 3 mammo- grams and the use oi stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Cancer, 2004, 100(4): 710-714.
  • 9Vizcalno I, Gadea L, Andreo L, et al. Short-term follow-up re- sults in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography. Radiology, 2001,219(2):475-483.
  • 10Mendez A, Cabanillas F, Echenique M, et al. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using ll-gauge ster- eotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Ann Oncol, 2004,15(3) :450-454.

引证文献3

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部