期刊文献+

系统淋巴结切除在子宫内膜癌治疗中的临床意义探讨 被引量:10

The Clinical Significance of Systematic Lymphadenectomy in Treatment of Endometrial Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨子宫内膜癌患者在行系统(盆腔加腹主动脉旁)淋巴结切除的临床意义,以提高子宫内膜癌的疗效。方法:收集我院在2007年4月至2012年3月行系统淋巴结切除,并经病理检查确诊为子宫内膜癌的患者91例,分析其术中术后情况、腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的影响因素及与生存率的关系。结果:91例患者中29例出现淋巴结转移,转移率为31.9%,其中盆腔淋巴结转移20例(22.0%),腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移23例(25.3%)。发生术中并发症6例(6.6%),术后并发症8例(8.8%)。多因素分析显示,非子宫内膜样癌、低分化(G3)、子宫肌层浸润深度>1/2、盆腔淋巴结转移是腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的独立危险因素。腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移患者的累积生存率(36.9%)明显低于无淋巴结转移患者累积生存率(91.9%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:系统淋巴结切除对提高子宫内膜癌的疗效非常重要,且安全可行。 Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of systematic lymphadenectomy( pelvic and/ or para-aortic) in treatment of endometrial cancer. Methods :91 patients with endometrial cancer in Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University from April 2007 to March 2012 were enrolled in this study. The intraoperative and postoperative conditions, the risk factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis, and survival rate were analyzed. Results:Twenty-nine(31.9%)of 91 patients had lymph node metastasis, including 20 with pelvic lymph node metastasis (22.0%) and 23 with para-aortic lymph node metastasis (25. 3% ). The multivariate analysis showed that non-endometrioid adenocarcinoma,G3,myometrial invasion,and pelvic lymph node metastasis were independent risk factors for para-aortic lymph node metastasis. The cumulative survival rate for patients with para-aortic lymph node metastasis was 36. 9% ,which was significantly lower than those without lymph node me- tastasis(91.9%, P 〈0. 05). Conclusions:It is beneficial and feasible to do systematic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer.
出处 《实用妇产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期369-372,共4页 Journal of Practical Obstetrics and Gynecology
关键词 子宫内膜癌 盆腔淋巴结切除 腹主动脉旁淋巴结切除 Endometrial carcinoma Pelvic lymph node dissection Para-aortic lymph node dissection
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Cust AE, Kaaks R, Friedenreich C, et al. Metabolic syndrome, plasma lipid, lipoprotein and glucose levels, and endometrial cancer risk in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition( EP- IC) [ J ]. Endocr Relat Cancer,2007,14 ( 3 ) :755 - 767.
  • 2Delpech Y, Barranger E. Management of lymph nodes in endometrioid uterine cancer[J]. Curr Opin Oncol,2010,22(5 ) :487 -491.
  • 3Todo Y, Kato H, Kaneuchi M, et al. Survival effect of para-aortic lym-phadenectomy in endometrial cancer( SEPAL study):a retrospective cohort analysis[ J ]. Lancet ,2010,375 ( 9721 ) : 1165 - 1172.
  • 4Turan T, Yilmaz SS, Hizli D, et al. A prospective evaluation of lym- phatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: is it adequate to perform lymph node dissection up to the inferior mesenteric artery [ J ]. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2011,21 ( 5 ) : 864 - 869.
  • 5Konno Y,Todo Y, Minobe S, et al. A retrospective analysis of postop- erative complications with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer [ J ]. lnt J Gynecol Cancer, 2011,21 ( 2 ) : 385- 390.
  • 6Chan JK, Kapp DS. Role of complete lymphadenectomy in endometri- oid uterine cancer [ J ]. Lancet Oncol, 2007,8 ( 9 ) : 831 - 841.
  • 7Mariani A ,Dowdy SC ,CIiby WA ,et al. Prospective assessment of lym- phatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgi- cal staging [ J ]. Gynecol 0ncol,2008,109 ( 1 ) : 11 - 18.

同被引文献66

引证文献10

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部