友谊质量与孤独感关系的meta分析

A meta-analysis of relationship between friendship quality and loneliness

目的:运用meta分析探讨友谊质量与孤独感之间的关系及友谊质量的测量工具、所选被试人群和文化背景(东西方)对两者关系的作用。方法:通过系统检索CNKI数据库、万方数据检索系统、Wiley Online library、Web of Science、Google学术和读秀等中英文数据库,以正常被试为研究对象[不包括各种疾病患者(如孤独症等)],收集1984-2014年间有关友谊质量与孤独感关系的相关研究。数据分析采用CMA2.0软件进行,计算友谊质量与孤独感的估计值(r)及其95%可信区间(95%CI)。结果:共有46篇文献满足meta分析的要求,总样本量为19422,其中以东方人群为被试的文献有24篇,被试量为11846;以西方人群为被试的文献22篇,被试量为7676。友谊质量与孤独感存在负相关(r=-0.28,95%CI:-0.23^-0.32)。友谊质量的测量工具能够调节友谊质量与孤独感的关系(Q=11.95,P<0.01);被试群体对友谊质量与孤独感的关系有调节作用(Q=19.54,P<0.001);不同文化背景下,个体的友谊质量与孤独感的关系差异无统计学意义(Q=0.05,P>0.05)。结论:友谊质量与孤独感存在关联,其中测量工具、被试群体对友谊质量与孤独感关系有影响,但是文化背景不能影响友谊质量与孤独感的关系。

Objective：To explore the relationship between friendship quality and loneliness and its influent factors like the measuring tool of friendship quality,the participants groups and cultural background. Methods：The studies on the association between the friendship quality and loneliness were collected through the databases of Chi-na National Knowledge Infrastructure,Wan Fang,Wiley Online library,Web of Science,Google Scholar and Duxiu from 1984 to 2014. Meta-analysis was conducted with the use of the CMA2. 0. Estimated value （r）and their 95%confidence interval （95%CI）was calculated to analyze the association between the friendship quality and loneliness from normal subjects except physiological disease （such as autism,etc. ）. Results：Totally 46 literatures were met the requirements of meta-analysis with sample size of 19422,including 24 researches With 11846 participants who were from eastern countries,and 22 studies with 7676 western people. There was significant negative correlation of friendship quality and loneliness （r=-0. 28,95%CI：-0. 23--0. 32）. The friendship quality measuring tool was able to adjust the relations of friendship quality and loneliness （Q=11. 95,P〈0. 01）. The participants groups had a regulatory role on the relationship between the friendship quality and loneliness （Q=19. 54,P〈0. 001）. Under dif-ferent cultural background of the subjects,the relationship between their friendship quality and loneliness was notsignificant difference （Q=0. 05 ,P〉0. 05 ）. Conclusion：It suggests that friendship quality has an influence on lone-liness. Measuring tools and subjects groups effect the relationship friendship quality and loneliness except cultural background.