期刊文献+

基于改进RMR方法的深部隧道稳定性分析 被引量:2

Analysis on Stability of Deep Tunnel Based on Modified RMR Method
原文传递
导出
摘要 为了解决在岩石工程领域中的基于地质力学的岩体评级方法只适用于浅部岩层,而在大埋深、高应力环境中出现不适应性这一问题而展开研究,首先,从RMR分类方法入手,通过引入能较好反映岩体质量的岩体块度指数,并考虑地应力的影响,对传统的RMR分类方法进行改进,以确定出改进后的评估值RMRnew;其次,基于RMRnew确定出隧道支护体系的作用荷载,并对支护体系进行分析,确定其极限承载能力;最后,基于荷载-结构法构建起隧道稳定性分析框架,并对隧道安全状态进行评估。对工程实例进行分析发现,基于改进后的RMR分类方法所得到的分析结果与实际情况相符,说明地应力、岩块尺寸以及埋深等对隧道稳定性有明显影响。 The method of rock mass rating (RMR) based on geological mechanics in the field of rock engineering applies only to shallow strata but does not adapted to large bused depth and high stress environment. In order to solve this problem, First of all, based on the RMR classification method, by introducing rock block index which can better reflect rock quality into the method, and considering the influence of in-situ stress, the traditional RMR rock mass classification system is improved to determine RMR the modified value. Then, the load on tunnel support system is detern^ined based on the RMR and the support system is analysed to determine its ultimate bearing capacity. At last, the analysis framework of tunnel stability is constructed based on load-structure method, and the tunnel safety status is analysed. The analysis of a project example shows that the analysis result based on the modified RMR method is consistent with the actual situation, which illustrates that in-situ stress, rock block size and buried depth have obvious influence on the stability of tunnel.
出处 《公路交通科技》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期123-128,共6页 Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51078136 51378195)
关键词 隧道工程 隧道安全 改进RMR方法 荷载-结构法 岩体块度指数 地应力修正 稳定系数 tunnel engineering tunnel safety modified RMR method load-structure method rock block index (RBI) in-situ stress correction stability coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1宋克志,李福献,朱雷敏,王梦恕.隧道二衬结构受力影响因素的敏感性分析[J].公路交通科技,2014,31(2):86-91. 被引量:12
  • 2UNAL E. Design Guidelines and Roof Control Standards for Coal Mine Roofs [ R ]. State College, PA: Pennsylvania State University, 1983.
  • 3GOEL R K, JETHWA J L. Prediction of Support Pressure using RMR Classification [ C ] //Proceedings of Indian Geotechnical Conference. India: [s. n. ], 1991:48-52.
  • 4GOEL R K. Correlations for Predicting Support Pressures and Closures in Tunnels [ D ]. Nagpur, India: Nagpur University, 1994.
  • 5GOEL R K, JETHWA J L, PAITHANKAR A G. Indian Experiences with Q and RMR Systems [ J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1995, 10 (1) : 97 -109.
  • 6MARINOS V, MARINOS P, HOEK E. The Geological Strength Index: Applications and Limitations [ J ]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 2005, 64 (1) : 55 -65.
  • 7靳晓光,李晓红.高地应力区深埋隧道软弱围岩支护结构力学特性研究[J].公路交通科技,2008,25(2):101-105. 被引量:18
  • 8陈亮,陈寿根,张恒.基于应力路径和塑性评估的应力调整分析方法[J].公路交通科技,2013,30(10):80-85. 被引量:1
  • 9陈德基,刘特洪.岩体质量评价的新指标--块度模数[c]//全国首届工程地质学术会议论文选集.北京:科学出版社,1983:138-145.
  • 10张世殊.坝基岩体块度特征研究[J].工程地质学报,2001,9(4):353-356. 被引量:5

二级参考文献79

共引文献161

同被引文献21

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部