期刊文献+

我国药品支付价格形成及谈判定价中引入卫生技术评估的路径探讨 被引量:5

Exploration the Introduction of HTA in Drug Paying Price Formation and Pricing Negotiation in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:为完善我国药品价格制定制度提供政策建议。方法:综合运用文献法和比较研究法,结合公共政策和卫生技术评估(HTA)的原理和方法,分析国际药品定价制度的经验以及我国药品定价存在的问题。结果:我国药品定价机制经过了"全管-放开-管制-逐步放开"的过程。韩国将HTA引入医保支付价格制定程序,而法国则将其引入谈判定价程序。结论:建议相关部门构建药品价格形成机构的战略发展目标,实行分步走策略,明确优先使用HTA的药物类型,建立科研支撑网络,构建相关数据库及研究平台,开展相关人才培养等。 OBJECTIVE: To provide policy recommendations on the pharmaceutical pricing system in China.METHODS:We applied a mixture of methods including content analysis and comparative research methods, combining with principles and methods of public policy and health technology assessment(HTA), in the analysis of international experience in pharmaceutical pricing systems and the existing problems of China' s pricing system.RESULTS : the drug pricing mechanism in our country through the"whole tube-open-control-gradually let go" of the process. South Korea will paid the price establishment procedure, introduced the HTA; while France put HTA into the negotiation pricing procedure.CONCLUSIONS: Specific recommendations include to build a clear strategic development goal for drug price formation mechanism; to approach implementation step by step; to begin with carefully selected types of drugs; to build a supporting scientific research network; to build supporting databases and platforms; to build capacity.
出处 《中国药房》 CAS 北大核心 2015年第15期2020-2023,共4页 China Pharmacy
基金 中国人民大学科研项目
关键词 药品定价 卫生技术评估 医保支付价格 谈判定价 Pharmaceutical pricing Health technology assessment Medicare paying pricing Pricing negotiation
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献63

  • 1董文勇.德国社会医疗保险用药费用控制制度及其对中国的启示[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(2):208-217. 被引量:24
  • 2Peter Davey, Introduction - Pharmacoeconomics Requirements in Asia[EB/OL]. http://www.pharmafocusasia.com/strategy/ pharmacoeconomics asia.htm.
  • 3Health Insurance Review Agency, Guidelines for Economic Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals (Korea Version) [EB/OL].http:// www.ispor.org/peguidelines/source/Korean PE Guidelines Korean_Version .pdf.
  • 4Kun-SL,et al. Introducing Economic Evaluation as a Policy Tool in Korea: Will Decision Makers get Quality Information? A Critical Review of Published Korean Economic Evaluations[J] Pharmacoeconomics, 2005,23 (7): 709-721.
  • 5Sang-Eun Choi, Current State and Challenges of Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation in Korea[J]. J Prev Med Public Health, 2008,41 (2):74-79.
  • 6Bong-MY,et al. Health-Care Systems and Pharmacoeconomic Research in Asia-Pacific Region (korea version) [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2008,11 (Suppl 1):S137-S155.
  • 7Gary M O,How Economic Evaluation is Used for Drug Reimbursement and Formulary Decisions Asia Pacific Perspective[EB/OL] .http://www.id.novartis.com/download/Asian.pdf.
  • 8Eun YB,et al. Pharmacoeconomic Guidelines and Their Implementation in the Positive List System in South Korea[J] VALUE IN HEALTH,2009,12 (Suppl 3): S36-S41.
  • 9Puig J. The Impact of Generic Reference Pricing Interven- tions in the Statin Market [ J ]. Health Policy, 2007, 84 (1) : 14-29.
  • 10Atella V. Drug cost containment policies in Italy: are they really effective in the long-run? The case of minimum refer- ence price[J]. Health Policy, 2000, 50(3) : 197-218.

共引文献54

同被引文献37

  • 1陈英耀,田丹.中国卫生技术评估的机遇和展望[J].中国医院管理,2008,28(9):1-4. 被引量:14
  • 2胡建平,饶克勤,钱军程,吴静.中国慢性非传染性疾病经济负担研究[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,2007,15(3):189-193. 被引量:159
  • 3World Health Organization. WHO guideline on country phar- maceutical pricing policies[R]. Geneva: World Health Orga- nization, 2015.
  • 4RON A. Health technology assessment in the United Kingdom [J]. Value in health, 2010, 13(Supplement):S4-S5.
  • 5KOHLI H S. Health technology assessment and health poli- cy-making in Europe: current stares[J]. Challenges and po- tential public health (Elsevier), 2010, 124(5) :298-299.
  • 6CHEN Y Y, BANTA D, TANG Z L. Health technology as- sessment development in China[J]. International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2009,25(Supplement I ) : 202-209.
  • 7WILL1SON D J, MACLEOD S M. The role of research evi- dence in pharmaceutical policy making: evidence when nec- essary but not necessarily evidence[J]. Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 1999,5(2) :243-249.
  • 8SUN Q, SANTORO M A, MENG Q Y, et al. Pharmaceutical policy in China[J]. Health affairs, 2008,27(4) : 1042-1050.
  • 9ZECHMEISTER I, SCHUMACHER I. The impact of health technology assessment reports on decision making in Austria [J]. International journal technology assessment in health care, 2012,28( 1 ) :77-84.
  • 10BARBIERI M, HAWKINS N, SCULPHER M. Who does the numbers The role of third-party technology assessment to inform health systems' decision-making about the fund- ing of health technologies[J]. Value in health, 2009, 12(2) : 193-201.

引证文献5

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部