期刊文献+

二语学习者词汇心理特征的动态变化研究 被引量:3

The Dynamic Change of Word Psycholinguistic Features of Chinese Learners of English
原文传递
导出
摘要 研究采用纵向和横断面相结合的方法,基于25名二语学习者为期135天的书面语语料,以时间和英语水平为自变量,词汇的心理特征(具体程度、意象程度、意义丰富程度和熟悉程度)为因变量来考察二语学习者书面语词汇心理特征及其关系是否随着时间的推移和英语水平提高发生变化。研究结果显示:(1)随着二语学习者学习时间的推移和英语水平的提高,学习者的词汇具体程度、意象程度、意义丰富程度和熟悉程度也随之发生变化,其均值由高变低;(2)学习者词汇熟悉程度和意象程度、具体程度、意义丰富程度之间的关系随着时间的推移和英语水平的提高逐渐加强,而它们之间的相关性却随着时间的推移和英语水平的提高逐渐降低。鉴于此,在二语词汇习得研究中,要把学习者词汇心理特征以及特征构成的词汇网络发展作为评价二语学习者词汇能力发展的指标之一。 Based on a written English corpus of 25 Chinese learners of English over 135 days,the study aims to investigate whether or not word psycholinguistic features and their correlations change with the course of time and language proficiency by treating time and language proficiency as an independent variable and word psycholinguistic features as dependent variables in a combination of longitudinal and cross-sectional methods.The results show:(1)word psycholinguistic features change with the course of time and the development of language proficiency in that the values of concreteness,imagery,meaningfulness and familiarity become smaller than before respectively;(2)correlations between word psycholinguistics features such as concreteness,imagery,meaningfulness and familiarity turn stronger with the elapse of time and the growth of language proficiency.Therefore,it is assumed that word psycholinguistic features and their network might indicate the development of vocabulary competence of second language learners.
出处 《当代外语研究》 2015年第4期43-48,77,共6页 Contemporary Foreign Language Studies
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Aizawa, K. 2006. Rethinking frequency markers for English- Japanese dictionaries [A]. In IV/ Murata, K. Minamide, Y. Tono & S. Ishikawa (eds.). English Lexicography in Japan [C]. Tokyo: Taishukan. 108-19.
  • 2Barber, H. A, L. J. Otten, S. Kousta& G. Vigliocco. 2013. Concreteness in word processing~ ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task [J].Brain & Language 125 : 47-53.
  • 3Crossley, S. A., D. Allen &.D. McNamara. 2011. Text readability and intuitive simplification.. A comparison of readability formulas N1 English [J]. Reading in a Foreign Language 23(1) : 86-101.
  • 4Crossley: S. A. , T. Salsbury & D. S. McNamara. 2009. Measuring L2 lexical growth using hypemymic relationships [J]. Language Learning 59:307-34.
  • 5Crossley, S. A., T. Salsbury & D. S. McNamara. 2010. The development of semantic relations in second language speakers: A case for Latent Semantic Analysis[J]. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics 7 : 55-74.
  • 6Crossley, S. A. , T. Salsbury, McNamara, D. S. &. S. Jarvis. 2011. What is lexical proficiency? Some answers from computational models of speech data [J]. TESOL Quarterly 45 : 182-193.
  • 7Daller, H. &. H. Xue. 2007. Lexical richness and the oral proficiency of Chinese EFL students [A]. In H. Daller, J. Milton & J. Treffers-Daller (eds). Modeling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge [ C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 93-115.
  • 8Ellis, R. 2002. Frequency effects in language processing. A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition [J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 24(2) : 143-88.
  • 9Ellis, N. & A. Beaton. 1993. Psycholinguisticdeterminants of foreign language vocabulary acquisition [J]. Language Learning 43: 559-617.
  • 10Gee, N. R. &. D. Krawezyk. 1999. Is the concreteness effect a result of underlying network intereonnectivity? [J] Journal of Memory and Language 40 : 479-97.

二级参考文献18

  • 1杨晓荣.从答卷看教学——TEM4-93作文阅卷手记[J].外语教学与研究,1993,25(4):70-72. 被引量:28
  • 2张在新,吴红云,王晓露,张俊香.我国英语写作教学中的主要问题[J].外语教学与研究,1995,27(4):43-50. 被引量:335
  • 3杨玉晨,闻兆荣.中国学生英文写作的句子类型及分析[J].现代外语,1994,17(1):39-42. 被引量:120
  • 4Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Cohen, A. D. 1989. Attribution in the productive lexicon of two Portuguese third language speakers[J]. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11.
  • 6Engber, C. A. 1995. The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions [J]. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4.
  • 7Laufer, B. & P. Nation. 1995. Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production[J]. Applied Linguistics, 16.
  • 8Laufer, B. 1998. The development of passive and active vocabulary in second language: same or different? [J]. Applied Linguistics, 19.
  • 9Leki, I. & J. Carson. 1994. Students' perceptions of EAP writing instruction and writing needs across the disciplines[J]. TESOL Quarterly, 28.
  • 10Meara, P. 1996. The dimensions of lexical competence[A]. In Brown, G. et al (eds.) Performance & Competence in Second Language Acquisition[C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

共引文献798

同被引文献13

引证文献3

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部