期刊文献+

An Early Evaluation and Comparison of Three Private Cloud Computing Software Platforms 被引量:2

An Early Evaluation and Comparison of Three Private Cloud Computing Software Platforms
原文传递
导出
摘要 Cloud computing, after its success as a commercial infrastructure, is now emerging as a private infrastructure. The software platforms available to build private cloud computing infrastructure vary in their performance for management of cloud resources as well as in utilization of local physical resources. Organizations and individuals looking forward to reaping the benefits of private cloud computing need to understand which software platform would provide the efficient services and optimum utilization of cloud resources for their target applications. In this paper, we present our initial study on performance evaluation and comparison of three cloud computing software platforms from the perspective of common cloud users who intend to build their private clouds. We compare the performance of the selected software platforms from several respects describing their suitability for applications from different domains. Our results highlight the critical parameters for performance evaluation of a software platform and the best software platform for different application domains. Cloud computing, after its success as a commercial infrastructure, is now emerging as a private infrastructure. The software platforms available to build private cloud computing infrastructure vary in their performance for management of cloud resources as well as in utilization of local physical resources. Organizations and individuals looking forward to reaping the benefits of private cloud computing need to understand which software platform would provide the efficient services and optimum utilization of cloud resources for their target applications. In this paper, we present our initial study on performance evaluation and comparison of three cloud computing software platforms from the perspective of common cloud users who intend to build their private clouds. We compare the performance of the selected software platforms from several respects describing their suitability for applications from different domains. Our results highlight the critical parameters for performance evaluation of a software platform and the best software platform for different application domains.
出处 《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2015年第3期639-654,共16页 计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
关键词 cloud computing cloud computing software platform performance evaluation and comparison cloud computing, cloud computing software platform, performance evaluation and comparison
  • 相关文献

参考文献35

  • 1Vaquero L M, Rodero-Merino L, Caceres J, Lindner M. A break in the Clouds: Towards a cloud definition. ACM SIGCOMM Comput. Commun. Rev., 2009, 39(1): 50-55.
  • 2Shafer J. I/O virtualization bottlenecks in cloud computing today. In Proc. the 2nd Workshop on I/O Virtualization, March 2010, pp.5-12. http://li46-224.members.linode.com/publications/papers/shafer-wiov2010.pdf, Dec. 2014.
  • 3Wardley S, Goyer E, Barcet N. Ubuntu enterprise Cloud architecture. Technical White Paper, Ubuntu, 2009. http://www.ubuntu.com/sites/default/files/active/White%20Paper%2011buntu%20Enterprise%20Cloud%20Architecture%20vl.pdf, Apr. 2015.
  • 4Nurmi D, Wolski R, Grzegorczyk C, Obertelli G, Soman S, Youseff L, Zagorodnov D. Eucalyptus: An open-source cloud computing infrastructure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2009, 180(1): 012051.
  • 5Saavedra R H, Smith A J. Analysis of benchmark characteristics and benchmark performance prediction. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 1996, 14(4): 344-384.
  • 6Pu X, Liu L, Mei Y, Sivathanu S, Koh Y, Pu C. Understanding performance interference of I/O workload in virtualized cloud environments. In Proc. the 3rd IEEE CLOUD, July 2010, pp.51-58.
  • 7Mucci P J, London K, Thurman J. The CacheBench report. Technical Report, ut-cs-98-394, University of Tennessee, 1998. http://icl.cs.utk.edu/projects/llcbench/cachebench.pdf, Jan. 2015.
  • 8SchuLLER F. Grid computing with and standard test cases for a meteorological limited area model J Master ThesisJ. Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, 2007. http://imgi.uibk.ac.at/file/157/download?token=KQL58LB2, Jan. 2015.
  • 9Deshane T, Shepherd Z, Matthews J, Ben-Yehuda M, Shah A, Rao B. Quantitative comparison of Xen and KVM. In Proc. Xen Summit, June 2008. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228772586Quantitative_comparison .of.Xen.and.KVlvl /links /004635229734fe42f6000000, Jan. 2015.
  • 10Reddy V V, Rajamani L. Evaluation of different hypervisors performance in the private cloud with SIGAR framework. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 2014, 5(2): 60-66.

同被引文献19

  • 1邱胜海,赵大中,王宁生.基于J2EE的CMP组件技术在企业MIS中的应用研究[J].机械设计与制造,2004(6):25-27. 被引量:1
  • 2邱胜海,马银忠,刘极峰.ADO.NET组件在企业信息系统中的研究与实现[J].微计算机信息,2005,21(09X):4-7. 被引量:15
  • 3刘鹏.云计算[M].第2版.北京:电子工业出版社,2012.
  • 4Anithakumari S, Chandra S K. Autonomic SLA management in cloud computing services [ C ]//Proc of SNDS 2014. Berlin: Springer Verlag ,2014.
  • 5Jiang X. Design and implementation of online English transla- tion system based on cloud computing model[ C ]//Proc of 5th international conference on intelligent systems design and en- gineering applications. Hunan : IEEE, 2014 : 338-342.
  • 6Ahmadi M, Khanezaei N. Manavi S, et al. A comparative study of time management and energy consumption in mobile cloud computing[ C]//Proc of 5th IEEE control and system gradu- ate research colloquium. Shah Alam : IEEE ,2014 : 199-203.
  • 7林仕.百度云计算总体介绍[EB/OL].[2014-09-13].http://wenku.baidu.corn/view/c477be6348d7cIe708a1451d.html.
  • 8徐强,王振江.云计算应用开发实践[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2013.
  • 9陈全,邓倩妮.云计算及其关键技术[J].计算机应用,2009,29(9):2562-2567. 被引量:932
  • 10陶飞,张霖,郭华,罗永亮,任磊.云制造特征及云服务组合关键问题研究[J].计算机集成制造系统,2011,17(3):477-486. 被引量:212

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部