期刊文献+

上市公司互联网投资者关系管理存在印象管理行为吗 被引量:1

Do Listed Corporations Have Impression Management Behaviors in their Internet Investor Relationship Management?
原文传递
导出
摘要 以2013年十大黑榜上市公司为样本进行选择性列报分析,并以中国百强上市公司为样本对其网站发布的董事长报告书及业绩新闻稿进行基于关键词的主题分析和基于陈述的主题分析。研究结果表明:上市公司互联网投资者关系管理存在以选择性列报和强烈的正面主题偏向为特征的印象管理行为,可能对投资者造成误导,有必要将其纳入监管范围并尝试设计新型的监管机制,适当引导和强化监管并举,为保护投资者权益和促进我国资本市场持续健康发展提供应有保障。 Taking the top ten blacklisted corporations in 2013 as the research samples, this paper conducts a selective presentation analysis. Then taking China' s top 100 listed corporations as sam- pies, it conducts a thematic analysis based on the keywords and statements from the reports made by the chairman of the board and the press releases of performance, which are published on their web- sites. The results show that there exist impression management behaviors in the internet investor rela- tionship management of the listed corporations, with typical characteristics of selective presentation and intense positive thematic bias, which may mislead the investors. Therefore, it is necessary to bring them into the scope of supervision and regulation, and try to design innovative regulation mechanism with proper guidance and enhanced regulation, so as to provide due guarantee to the protection of the investors' interests and the continuous healthy development of capital markets in China.
作者 林琳 潘琰
出处 《当代财经》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期119-128,共10页 Contemporary Finance and Economics
基金 国家软科学研究计划项目"微内容冲击 上市公司信息披露与投资者保护"(2014GXS4D116) 国家自然科学基金项目"分布式数据一致性与XBRL网络财务报告质量控制"(71171097)
关键词 互联网 投资者关系管理 印象管理 选择性列报 主题偏向 intcrnet investor relationship management impression management selective presentation thematic bias
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Clatworthy M. A., Jones M. J: The Effect of Thematic Structure on the Variability of Annual Report Readability[J]. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2001, 14(3): 311-326.
  • 2Merld-davies D. M., Brennan N. M., Mcleay S. J: Impression Management and Retrospective Sense-making in Corpo- rate Narratives: A Social Psychology PerspectivelY. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2011, 24(3): 315-344.
  • 3Smith M., Tafler R. J: The Chairman' s Statement and Corporate Financial Performance[J]. Accounting and Finance, 1992, 32(2): 75-90.
  • 4Thomas J: Discourse in the Marketplace: The Making of Meaning in Annual Reports[J]. The Journal of Business Communication, 1997, 34(1): 47-66.
  • 5Barkemeyer B., Comyns B., Figge F., Napolitsno G: CEO Statements in Sustainability Reports: Substantive Information or Background Noise[J]. Accounting Forum, 2014, 38: 241-257.
  • 6Clatworthy M. A., Jones M. J: Financial Reporting of Good News and Bad News: Evidence from Accounting Narra- tives[J]. Accounting and Business Research, 2003, 33(3): 171-185.
  • 7Clatworthy Mo A., Jones M. J: Differential Reporting Patterns of Textual Characteristics and Company Performance in the Chairman' s Statement[J]. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2006, 19(4): 493-511.
  • 8Guillamen-saorin E: Impression Management in Financial Reporting, Evidence from the UK and Spain[M]. Doctoral Dissertation, University College Dublin, 2006.
  • 9Bowen R. M., Davis A. K., Matsumoto D. A: Emphasis on Pro Forma Versus GAAP Earnings in Quarterly Press Releases: Determinants, SEC Intervention and Market Reactious[J]. The Accounting Review, 2005, 80(4): 1011-1038.
  • 10Schrand C., Walther B. R: Strategic Benchmarks in Earnings Announcements: The Selective Disclosure of Prior-pe- riod Earnings Components[J]. The Accounting Review, 2000, 75(2): 151-177.

二级参考文献56

  • 1孙蔓莉,王化成,凌哲佳.关于公司年报自利性归因行为的实证研究[J].经济科学,2005(2):86-93. 被引量:33
  • 2[1]Adelberg, A. H. 1979. Narrative disclosures contained in financial reports: Means of communication or manipulation? Accounting and Business Research (Summer): 179 - 189
  • 3[2]Baker Ⅲ. H. E. and D. D. Kare. 1992. Relationship between annual report readability and corporate financial performance.Management Research News 15:1 -4
  • 4[3]Courtis. J. K. 1986. An investigation into annual report readability and corporate risk return relationships. Accounting and Business Resrch (Autumn): 285 - 294
  • 5[4]Courtis. J. K. 1995. Readability of annual reports: western versus asian evidence. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal vol. 8, no. 2
  • 6[5]Jones. M. J. 1998. Annual report readability variability: Tests of the obfuscation gypothesis. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, 459-471
  • 7[6]Jones. M. J. 1996. Comments on eadability of annual reports: western versus asian evidence. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal vol. 9, No. 2:86-91
  • 8[7]Jones. M. J. and Shoemaker. P. A. 1994. Accounting narratives: A review of emirical studies of content and readability. Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 13: 142- 184
  • 9[8]Jones. M. J. 1988. Accounting Narratives: A Review of Empirical Studies of Content and Readability, Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 13: 142-184
  • 10[9]Jones. M. J. 1988. A longitudinal study of the readability of the chairman 抯 narratives in the corporate reports of a UK company.Accounting and Business Research 18 (Autumn) : 297 - 305

共引文献150

同被引文献28

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部