期刊文献+

密封第一价格采购中销售商串谋的监管机制研究

Research on Regulation Mechanism of Bid Rigging in Sealed-Bid First-Price Procurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 标准拍卖中普遍存在的竞拍者串谋不仅给拍卖方和社会福利带来损失,而且由于缺乏数据常难以检测和控制。鉴于此,采用四阶段序贯博弈分析密封第一价格采购中竞拍者串谋的监管问题,基于销售商的竞拍出价建立检测采购中竞拍者串谋的理论模型,相比其他检测模型多依赖于包括竞价、产能、库存、参与决策在内的大量竞拍者的历史和当期数据的"事后"检测特点,该模型具有仅依赖于竞价和估价的当期数据的"事中"检测特点。研究得到存在串谋和不存在串谋两种情况下,销售商不同的出价分布和出价区间,以及监管方对销售商串谋的概率判断和审核决策,解决了难以获取研究所需充足数据的困境,提高了串谋检测的可操作性。 The bidder collusion universally existed in standard auction usually brings loss of auctioneer and social welfare at large, and is often difficult to detect and control due to the lack of data. In view of this, this paper analyzes the regulation system in sealed - bid first - price procurement by four - stage Sequential game. In order to achieve this, a theoretical model based on the bidding price of sellers during auction has been established. Contrasted to previous models which could only post - detect auction re- lying on historical and current data such as bidding price, production capacity, inventory and anticipation decision of the partici- pants, this model can simultaneously detect the distribution and interval of sellers' price as well as supervisor' s probability recog- nizing and examine decision to them based on current data only in both cases of conspiracy and non - conspiracy during the bidding, thus solve the problem of lacking data and improve the operability of conspiracy - detecting.
出处 《鸡西大学学报(综合版)》 2015年第5期77-81,共5页 JOurnal of Jixi University:comprehensive Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"行为管理制度漏洞治理设计的工程化方法研究"(70871080 71171134) 上海市教委科研创新重点项目"基于行为概率的动态税制的符号化设计方法研究"(11ZS138) 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题"制度漏洞治理设计的结构化方法研究"(2011BGL006) 上海市一流学科建设项目"上海市高原学科:管理科学与工程"(S1201YLXK)
关键词 密封第一价格采购 竞拍者串谋 监管机制 序贯博弈 检测模型 sealed - bid first - price procurement bid rigging regulation mechanism sequential game detecting model, I^71 ~ ~Q ]l^m-tlm^nt M^rk. A
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Feinstein J S, Block M K, Nold F C. Asymmetric in- formation and collusive behavior in auction markets [ J ]. The American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (3) : 441 - 460.
  • 2Porter R H, Zona J D. Detection of bid rigging in procurement auctions[J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1993: 518 -538.
  • 3Porter R H, Zona J D. Ohio school milk markets: an analysis of bidding [ R]. National Bureau of Economic Re- search, 1997.
  • 4Pesendorfer M. A study of collusion in first - price auctions [ J ]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67 (3) : 381 -411.
  • 5Baldwin L H, Marshall R C, Richard J F. Bidder collusion at forest service timber sales [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 1997, 105(4):657-699.
  • 6Asker J. A study of the internal organization of a bid- ding cartel[ J 1. The American Economic Review, 2010:724 - 762.
  • 7Graham D A, Marshall R C. Collusive bidder behav- ior at single - object second - price and english auctions [ J ].The Journal of Political Economy, 1987, 95 (6): 1217 - 1239.
  • 8McAfee R P, McMillan J. Bidding rings[J]. The A- merican Economic Review, 1992 : 579 - 599.
  • 9Marshall R C, Marx L M. Bidder collusion [J]. Journal of Economic Theory, 2007, 133( 1 ) : 374 -402.
  • 10王宏,陈宏民,顾巧明.基于第二价格预拍的竞标者合谋均衡分析[J].中国管理科学,2010,18(3):132-140. 被引量:6

二级参考文献37

  • 1潘泽清,张维.大股东与经营者合谋行为及法律约束措施[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):118-122. 被引量:29
  • 2董志强,蒲勇健.公共管理领域监察合谋防范机制[J].中国管理科学,2006,14(3):116-121. 被引量:17
  • 3Feinstein, J. S. , Block, M. K. , Nold, F.D.. Asymmetric information and collusive behavior in auction markets [J]. American Economic Review, 1985, 75 (3):441--460.
  • 4Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Detection of bid-rigging in procurement auctions [J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1993, 101(3): 518--538.
  • 5Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H.. An empirical study of an auction with asymmetric information [J. The American Economic Review, 1988, 78(5): 865--883.
  • 6Hendricks, K. , Porter, R. H. , Tan,G.. Bidding rings and the winner's curse [J]. RAND Journal of Economics, 2008, 39(4): 1018--1041.
  • 7Porter, R. H. , Zona, D. J.. Ohio school milk markets: An analysis of bidding [J]. The RAND Journal of Economics, 1999, 30(2)I 263--88.
  • 8Pesendorfer, M.. A study of collusion in first-price auctions [J]. The Review of Economic Studies, 2000, 67 , (3): 381--411.
  • 9Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J. A.. Collusive bidding:Lessons from the FCC spectrum auctions [J]. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2000, 17(3): 229--252.
  • 10Cramton, P. C. , Schwartz, J.A.. Collusive bidding in the FCC spectrum auctions E J2. Contributions to Economic Analysis and Policy, 2002, 1(1), Article 11.

共引文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部