摘要
从全日制公共卫生硕士专业学位研究生教育综合改革试点的相关工作入手,介绍北京大学和复旦大学自2010年以来,在全日制公共卫生硕士培养定位、招生选拔、课程体系、师资队伍、实践教学、科研以及学位论文等方面的经验。比较美国约翰·霍普金斯大学、哈佛大学与试点院校在公共卫生硕士培养模式的异同,为完善我国全日制公共卫生硕士培养体系提出意见和建议。
From the related work of comprehensive reform pilot for full-time Master of Public Health (MPH) professional degree education, we introduced Peking University and Fudan University's specific measures and achievements of cultivation of MPH position, admissions, curriculum, faculty, teaching, research, dissertations and etc. While comparing China's modes with John Hopkins University's and Harvard University's, we gave advice and made suggestions for our future full-time master of public health graduate training in China.
出处
《中华医学教育探索杂志》
2015年第3期228-231,共4页
Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基金
中国学位与研究生教育学会资助项目(A2-2013Y02-002)