期刊文献+

路面清扫控制径流重金属污染研究 被引量:1

Research on Road Sweepers Treating Runoff Heavy Metals Pollution
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以长深高速滨州段作为研究对象,分析路面径流中重金属浓度变化规律,结合现场清扫实验结果预测路面清扫对径流重金属的控制效果。研究发现路面降雨径流形成初期,径流中重金属浓度即达到了峰值,该次降雨事件初期冲刷效应显著,其中Zn超过Ⅲ类水质标准值,Pb超过V类水质标准值,两种重金属污染严重;降雨径流中溶解态Cu、Pb、Zn的浓度占各自总浓度的比例分别为33.2%、10%和36%;降雨径流对粒径小于63μm和介于63~125μm之间颗粒物的冲刷作用显著,冲刷率分别为70%和45%。清扫车对不同粒径颗粒物的去除率由37.82%增加到98.33%,总去除率为86.07%。预测结果表明清扫车对溶解态Cu、Pb、Zn的去除率分别为64.76%、62.90%和58.51%。 Based on the study results of Changshen highway in Binzhou, the discharge rules of heav,. metals in road runoff were discussed, and the performance of street sweepers for treating dissolved heav,. metals was predicted on the basis of this study. The results indicated that the concentrations of heavy met als reached peaks in the initial road runoff, which exhibited a pronounced first flush in this rainfall event. Concentrations of Zn and Pb exceeded class HI and V of water quality standards, respectively, the pollu- tion extent of Zn and Pb are seriously. The ratio of dissolved Cu, Pb and Zn were 33.2e//00, 20% and 36~, respectively. Road runoff scoured 70% particles smaller than 63μm and 45% particles ranged from 63 tc 125μm. The removal efficiency of road sweepers on long-term build-up particles of different size increased from 37.82%to 98. 330%, with total removal efficiency 86.07%. The result calculated by formula of dis- solved metals reduce volume indicatesd that the removal efficiency for dissolved Cu, Pb and Zn were 64. 76%, 62.90% and 58.51%
出处 《中国海洋大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期82-86,共5页 Periodical of Ocean University of China
基金 国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2008ZX07010-008-04) 山东省科技攻关项目(2009GG20006010)资助
关键词 路面清扫 降雨径流 重金属污染 冲刷率 重金属去除率 road sweeping rainfall runofall heavy metal pollution wash-off efficiency removal efficien-cy for heavy metals
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1赵剑强,闫敏,刘珊,张志杰.城市路面径流污染的调查[J].中国给水排水,2001,17(1):33-35. 被引量:84
  • 2Terzakis S, Fountoulakis M S, Georgaki I, et al. Constructed wet- lands treating highway runoff in the central Mediterranean region f-J3. Chemosphere, 2008, 72: 141-149.
  • 3Herricks E E. Stormwater runoff and receiving systems-impact, monitoring and assessment EM:. New York: Lewis Publis hers, 1995: 55-57.
  • 4Revitt D M, Shutes R B E, Jones R H, et al. The performances of vegetative treatment systems for highway runoff during dry and wet conditions [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2004, 334: 261-270.
  • 5Hares R J, Ward N I. Comparison of the heavy metal content of motorway stormwater following discharge into wet biofiltration and dry detention ponds along the London Orbital (M25) motorway FJ:. The Science of the Total Environment, 1999, 235: 169-178.
  • 6Kayhanian M, Suverkropp C, Ruby A, et al. Characterization and prediction of highway runoff constituent event mean concentration FJ:. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 85: 279-295.
  • 7Sutherland R C, Jelen S L, Minton G. High efficiency sweeping as an alternative to the use of wet vaults for stormwater treatment [-M:. //: James William, eds. Es. n. 1: Published in advances in modelling the management of stormwater impacts, Volume 6. CH1, Publications. 1998.
  • 8国家环境保护总局水和废水监测分析方法编委会.水和废水监测分析方法[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 9国家环境保护总局.地表水环境质量标准(GB3838-2002)[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社,2002.
  • 10Sansalone J J, Buchberger S G. Partitioning and first flush of metals in urban roadway water [J]. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1997, 123(2): 134-143.

二级参考文献40

共引文献191

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部