期刊文献+

地高辛与酒石酸美托洛尔联合治疗心房纤颤的临床效果及安全性评价 被引量:1

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Digoxin and Metoprolol Tartrate in Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察地高辛与酒石酸美托洛尔(倍他乐克)联合治疗心房纤颤的临床效果及安全性。方法将76例符合入选标准的心房纤颤患者随机分为观察组和对照组,分别采用地高辛与倍他乐克联合治疗和单纯地高辛治疗,比较治疗效果和不良发应。结果治疗3个月后,观察组治疗后静息时心室率和活动后心室率控制效果比对照组更好,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组总有效率(94.7%)高于对照组(71.1%)(P<0.05)。两组均无明显不良反应。结论倍他乐克和地高辛联合应用治疗心房纤颤,临床疗效肯定,不良反应少,安全性高。 Objective To observe clinical effect and safety of digoxin and betaloc in treatment of atrial fibrillation.Methods 76 patients met the inclusion criteria for patients with atrial ifbrillation were divided into observation group and control group.ResultsAfter 3 months of treatment, the patients in the observation group resting ventricular rate and activities of ventricular rate control effect is better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion Betaloc and digoxin combination in the treatment of atrial ifbrillation, clinical efifcacy, is worthy of clinical application.
作者 荆腊平
出处 《中国继续医学教育》 2015年第12期131-132,共2页 China Continuing Medical Education
关键词 地高辛 倍他乐克 心房纤颤 Digoxin Betaloc Atrial ifbrillation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献12

  • 1刘彦茹.卡维地洛对老年永久性心房颤动心室率的控制[J].中国医药导报,2006,3(33):82-83. 被引量:4
  • 2周自强,胡大一,陈捷,张仁汉,李奎宝,赵秀丽.中国心房颤动现状的流行病学研究[J].中华内科杂志,2004,43(7):491-494. 被引量:1401
  • 3陈新.黄宛临床心电图学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:364-365,387-395.
  • 4Lim HS, Hamaad A,LIP GY. Clinical review: clinical management of atrial fibrillation-rate control versus thythm control. Crit Care, 2004,8:271-279.
  • 5Kannel WB,Abbott RD,Savage. DD,et al. Epidemio-logic features of chronic atrial fibrillation: The Framingharn Study[J]. N Eng! J Med, 1982,306:1 018.
  • 6Wyse DC,Waido AL,Dimarco JP,et al. Acomparison ofrate control and rhythm control in patients with atrial fibrillation[J] .N Eng J Med, 2002,347(23): 1825 - 1833.
  • 7Hohnloser SH, Kuek KH, Lilienthal J. Rhythm or rate control in atrial fibrillateion- phm- nacologieal in atrial fibrillation(PIAF): A random- ised trial[J]. Lancet,2000,356(9 244): 1789 - 1794.
  • 8Van Oelder IC,Hagens VE,Bosker HA,et al. For the rate control versus electrical eardioversion for persistent atrial fibril-lation study group. A comparison of rate control and: thythm control in pafiems with emrrentpersistenl, atrial fibrilation [ J ]. N Eng J Med, 2002,347 (23) : 1834 - 1840.
  • 9Carlsson J,Miketie S,Windeler,et al. Randomized trial ofrate COIl- trol versus rhythm control in persistent a al fibrilla- tion: the strate- gies of trealment of atrial fibrillation (STAF)study[J] . JAm Coil Cardiol, 2003,41:1690 - 1696.
  • 10胡大一,马长生.心房颤动心律控制与室率控制的比较[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,488.

共引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部