期刊文献+

痰标本甲氧西林耐药金黄色葡萄球菌培养与聚合酶链反应快速检测方法的比较 被引量:4

Detection of methicillin-resistant S.aureus from respiratory specimens of ICU patients by conventional sputum culture compared with rapid polymerase chain reaction assay
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价聚合酶链反应(PCR)快速检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)方法在痰标本中的应用。方法同时采集痰标本送细菌培养、真菌培养和PCR快速检测,以细菌培养方法为金标准,评价PCR方法的灵敏度和特异度。结果 PCR方法检测痰标本MRSA的灵敏度为88.9%,特异度为73.6%,阳性预测值为36.4%,阴性预测值为97.5%,均较文献报道的鼻拭子PCR的灵敏度和特异度低。结论将痰标本PCR检测MRSA用于临床动态监测MRSA的流行尚缺乏进一步的数据支持,但PCR结果不受其他细菌生长的影响,而且阴性预测值高达97.5%,在排除MRSA感染或定植方面有一定价值。 Objective To evaluate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐based rapid detection of methicillin‐resistant S .aureus (MRSA) from the respiratory specimens of ICU patients in comparison with conventional sputum culture . Methods We collected 3 respiratory specimens from each patient simultaneously for bacterial culture ,fungal culture and PCR‐based detection of MRSA .The performance of the established PCR method was compared with the results of sputum culture in terms of sensitivity ,specificity ,positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) .Results The sensitivity , specificity ,PPV and NPV of PCR assay were 88 .9% ,73 .6% ,36 .4% ,and 97 .5% ,respectively ,which were lower than the reported results of PCR assay with nasal swabs .Conclusions The utility of PCR assay for active screening of MRSA from respiratory specimens still needs further supportive data .However ,PCR assay is somewhat informative in excluding MRSA infection or colonization because of its high NPV .
出处 《中国感染与化疗杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期260-263,共4页 Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy
基金 上海市自然科学基金(14ZR1434600)
关键词 耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 聚合酶链反应 细菌培养 下呼吸道感染 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction bacterial culture lower respiratory tract infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1高玉录,马筱玲.耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的快速检测方法[J].国际检验医学杂志,2008,29(8):718-719. 被引量:3
  • 2Luteijn JM, Hubben GA, Pechlivanoglou P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of culture based and PCR-based detection tests for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : a meta analysis [J]. Clin Microbiol Infect, 2011,17(2) : 146-154.
  • 3姚瑜.FDA批准首个甲氧西林耐药金葡菌感染快速检测试验[J].国外医药(抗生素分册),2008,29(2):91-92. 被引量:1
  • 4Polisena J, Chen S, Cimon K, et al. Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systemic review [J]. BMC Infectious Disease,2011,11:336.
  • 5Ho TH, Huang YC, Lin TY. Evaluation of the BE) GeneOhm StaphSR assay for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in patients in intensive care units [J]. J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 2011,44(4) :310 315.
  • 6Rajan H, Smyth E, Humphreys H. Screening for MRSA in ICU patients. How does PCR compare with culture? [J]. J Infect, 2007,55(4) :353 357.
  • 7Sarikonda KV, Micek ST, Doherty JA, et al. Methicillin- resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization is a poor predictor of intensive care uni>acquired of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections requiring antibiotic treatment [J]. Crit Care Med, 2010, 38(10): 1991-1995.
  • 8Oh AC, Iaee JK, Lee HN, et al. Clinical utility of the Xpert MRSA assay for early detection of methicillin-resistant Stapkylococcusaureus [J]. Mol Med Rep, 2(113, 7(1): 11-15.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Wang G, Hindler JF, Ward KW, et al. Increased vancomycin MICs for Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates from a university hospital during a 5-year period [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44 (11): 3883-3886.
  • 2Louie L, Soares D, Meaney H, et al. Evaluation of a new chromogenic medium, MRSA select, for detection of methicilliwre sistant Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44 (12):4561-4563.
  • 3Perry JD, Davies A, Butterworth LA, et al. Development and evaluation of a chromogenic agar medium for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2004, 42 (10) : 4519-4523.
  • 4Diederen BM, van-Leest ML, van Duijn I, et al. Performance of MRSA ID, a new chromogenic medium for detection of methicil lin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(2): 586-588.
  • 5Pape J, Wadlin J, Nachamkin I. Use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from blood cultures[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006, 44(7): 2575-2576.
  • 6Brown DF, Edwards DI, Hawkey PM, et al. Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicinin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) [J]. J Antimicrob Chemother, 2005, 56(6): 1000-1018.
  • 7Levi K, Towner KJ. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in blood with the EVIGENE MRSA detection kit [J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2003, 41(8): 3890-3892.
  • 8Otter JA, Havill NL, Boyce JM. Evaluation of real time polymerase chain reaction for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on environmental surfaces [J]. Infect Con trol Hosp Epidemiol, 2007, 28(8): 1003-1005.
  • 9Paule SM, Pasquarieno AC, Thomson RB Jr, et al. Real-time PCR can rapidly detect methicillin susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from positive blood culture bottles [J]. Am J Clin Pathol, 2005, 124(3): 404-407.
  • 10Thomas LC, Gidding HF, Ginn AN, et al. Development of a real-time Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA (SAM-) PCR for routine blood culture [J]. J Microbiol Methods, 2007, 68(2): 296- 302.

共引文献2

同被引文献22

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部