“耻辱”之后,再是什么——评丸尾常喜鲁迅研究专著《耻辱与恢复》

“Stigma”,and Beyond: Review of Maruo Tsuneki's Monograph on Lu Xun Study Stigma and Recovery

日本学者丸尾常喜从"耻"意识的角度展开对鲁迅的研究,恰切地将鲁迅的"民族的自我批评"和自我的生命呈现融为一体,既体现了日本民族的国民性中的物哀传统,同时也像一把镜子照出了中国文化传统中的一种严重的匮乏。但丸尾常喜的研究也存在偏见,他所极力挖掘并赞扬的鲁迅小说人物的"求生意志",其实正是鲁迅时时刻刻不忘批判的中国文化传统中"好死不如赖活着"的苟活意识,而且,丸尾常喜认为鲁迅是在"民众认识"的温情与力量中走向了恢复,从而将耻辱感的恢复看成了鲁迅文学活动的终点,不免缩减了鲁迅文学的意义。

Japanese scholar Maruo Tsuneki conducts the study of Lu Xun in respect of his awareness of“shame”, which proper-ly harmonizes Lu Xun＇s“national self-criticism” and self-presentation of life.His study not only reflects the Japanese tradition of senti-mentality in its national identity, but also mirrors a serious shortage in Chinese traditional culture.However, misinterpretations are found in Maruo Tsuneki＇s study.He attempts to explore and praise the protagonists＇“Will to Live” in Lu Xun＇s novels, which actually is the condemned ideology of“a living dog is better than a dead lion” in Chinese traditional culture, criticized by Lu Xun himself. What＇s more, Maruo Tsuneki argues that Lu Xun heads towards recovery in the warmth and strength of“People Know”, thus, regards the recovery of stigma as the end of Lu Xun＇s literary activities, which in effect belittles the significance of Lu Xun＇s literature.