期刊文献+

标准规制、产品责任制与声誉——产品质量安全治理研究综述 被引量:6

Standard Regulation,Product Responsibility System and Reputation:A Review of Product Quality and Safety Governance
下载PDF
导出
摘要 产品质量安全信息在买方与卖方之间的分布不对称,是导致产品市场发生"逆向选择"或"道德风险"的根本原因。引入标准规制能在一定程度上解决信息不对称问题,但不同市场结构下标准规制的干预强度及对不同厂商的激励效果存在争议。同时,产品责任制可以内部化预期事故成本激励生产具有潜在危害产品的厂商在事前采取预防措施。但两种规制也越来越多地面临高规制成本的质疑,低交易成本的声誉治理便可作为补充。本文综述产品质量安全领域的标准规制、产品责任制及声誉治理机制研究,重点梳理微观经济学模型的演化逻辑,为后续的基础理论研究提供比较全面的概览。 Information asymmetry about product quality and safety between buyer and seller is the main reason that leading market to ' adverse selection' or ' moral hazard'. In a certain extent,standard regulation can reduce information asymmetry,while the intensity of intervention and the motivation for different product manufacturers under different market structure are controversial. Meanwhile,product responsibility system can motivate product manufacturer incentive to take preventive actions before production process through internalization expected accident cost. But these two regulations are increasingly facing the query of high regulation cost,while reputation governance with lower transaction cost can be used as a supplement. This paper reviews the standard regulation,product responsibility system and reputation governance mechanism in the field of product quality,and analyzes the evolution logic of the microeconomic model,these provide a comprehensive overview for future researches.
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第5期50-59,156-157,共10页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金 国家社会科学基金青年基金<基于利益相关者行为博弈的产品安全问题研究>(13CJY003) 国家社会科学青年基金<基于纵向一体化的产品安全问题研究>(12CJL036)的资助
关键词 信息不对称 最低质量标准 产品责任制 垂直差异化 声誉机制 information asymmetry minimum quality standard product responsibility system vertical differentiation reputation mechanism
  • 相关文献

参考文献62

  • 1Nelson, P., " Information and consumer behavior" [J] ,Journal of Political Economy, 1970, 78(2) . 311-329.
  • 2Darby, M. R. and Karni, E. ," Free competition and the optimal amount of fraud" [ J ] , Journal of Law and Eco- nomics, 1973, 16(1). 67-88.
  • 3Gabszewicz, J. J. and Thisse, J. F. ," Price competi- tion, quality and income disparities" [ J ], Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 1979, 20(3) . 340-359.
  • 4Shaked, A. and Sutton, J., "Relaxing price competi- tion through product differentiation" [ J ], Review of Economic Studies, 1982, 49(1) . 3-13.
  • 5Bockstael, N. E. ," The welfare implications of mini- mum quality standards"[ J ] ,American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1984, 66(4) . 466-471.
  • 6Besanko, D.,Donnenfeld, S. &White, L. J.,"Monop- oly and quality distortion . effects and remedies" [ J ] , Quar- terly Journal of Economics, 1987, 102(4) . 743-768.
  • 7Champsaur, P. and Rochet, J. ," Muhiproduct duopo- lists" [J] ,Econometrica, 1989, 57(3) . 533-557.
  • 8Ronnen, U., " Minimum quality standards, fixed costs, and competition" [ J ], RAND Journal of Economics, 1991, 22(4) . 490-504.
  • 9Crampes, C. and Hollander, A. ," Duopoly and quality standards" [ J ] , European Economic Review, 1995, 39 ( 1 ) . 71-82.
  • 10Ecchia, G. and Lambertini, L., " Minimum quality standards and collusion" [ J ] , Journal of Industrial Econom- ics, 1997, 45(1) . 101-113.

二级参考文献117

共引文献29

同被引文献110

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部