庭审话语消极语用距离关系分析

An Analysis of Negative Prama-proxemics Relations in Court Discourse

文本描述了消极语用距离的定义和特征,基于真实的庭审话语语料,重点分析了目的冲突双方——公诉人和被告方之间的消极语用距离关系及其话语策略。研究发现,公诉人常常采取的消极语用距离话语策略主要包括:有罪预设、反驳、打断、否认、责问、再阐述、交代罪行等;被告律师的消极语用距离话语策略主要有反对、再阐述、对比、打断等;被告的消极语用距离话语策略有:弱化、模糊限制语、否认、修正、污秽语言、答非所问、重复、拖延时间等。最后提出了"有理""有利""有节""有礼"的庭审四原则。

This essay makes a tentative description of the definition and features of negative pragma-proxemics. Based onthe real court discourse, it focuses on analyzing the negative Prama-Proxemics Relations between the prosecutor and defendantin Court and some corresponding discoue strategies. It is found out that the prosecutor usually takes such discourse strategiesas presupposition of guilt, refutation, interruption, denial, reformulation, confession of crimes; the defendant lawyer takes suchones as opposition, reformulation, contrast, interruption; the defendant takes such ones as weakening, hedges, denial, repair,dirty words, irrelevant answer, repetition, delay of time. Finally, the essay tentatively advances the four principles of beingjustified, favorable, temperate and courteous in court.