期刊文献+

羊驼第一胃室与绵羊瘤胃固相和液相外流速率的比较 被引量:2

Solid and Fluid OutflowRate of the First Compartment in Alpaca and Rumen in Sheep
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本试验旨在确定羊驼第一胃室与绵羊瘤胃固相和液相外流速率。选用1周岁健康的公羊驼[(27.0±4.6)kg]与晋中公绵羊[(26.2±2.7)kg]各3只,通过钴(Co)和铬(Cr)双标记法测定固相和液相外流速率。结果显示,根据MC模型羊驼固相慢速外流速率k1(3.44%/h)有低于绵羊(4.32%/h)的趋势(P=0.072),固相快速外流速率k2,羊驼(16.90%/h)极显著低于绵羊(35.06%/h)(P<0.01);根据指数模型羊驼固相外流速率k(5.13%/h)与绵羊(5.14%/h)差异不显著(P>0.05);模型所得羊驼食糜胃肠道平均滞留时间高于绵羊。根据G4模型和指数模型,羊驼液相外流速率k(分别为6.21%/h和7.73%/h)与绵羊(分别为7.02%/h和8.43%/h)差异不显著(P>0.05),2种模型所得液相外流速率k差异不显著(P>0.05),但羊驼第一胃室容积(6.23 L)和外流速度(0.44 L/h)极显著低于绵羊瘤胃容积(10.69 L)和外流速度(0.90 L/h)(P<0.01)。结果提示,食糜在羊驼体内的消化时间长于绵羊,这可能是羊驼粗饲料消化率高的原因之一。 This experiment was conducted to determine the outflow rate of solids and fluid using double mark- ers of chromium (Cr) and cobalt (Co) from the first compartment in alpaca and rumen in sheep. Three health- y male alpacas [ (27.0±4.6) kg] and Jinzhong sheep [ (26.2±2.7) kg] were selected. The results showed as follows: estimated by multicompartrnental model, in comparison to sheep, solid slow outflow rate k1 showed a decreasing tendency (3.44%/h vs. 4.32%/h, P=0.072) and solid fast outflow rate k2 was significantly lower in alpaca ( 16.90%/h vs. 35.06%/h, P〈0.01 ). There was no significant difference to solid outflow rate k esti- mated by exponential model between alpaca (5.13%/h) and sheep (5.14%/h) (P〉0.05). Mean residence time (MRT) of alpaca was higher than that of sheep in both models. Estimated by gamma 4 model and expo- nential model, no significant difference was recorded to fluid outflow rate k between alpaca (6.21%/h and 7.73%/h) and sheep (7.02%/h and 8.43%/h) (P〉0.05). The volume (6.23 L) and out follow speed of the first compartment in alpaca(0.44 L/h) were significantly lower than those in sheep (10.69 L and 0.90 L/h) (P〈0.05). In conclusion, gastrointestinal retention time of digesta in alpaca is longer than that in sheep, and the difference can partly explain the reason that alpaca has a higher roughage digestion rate.
出处 《动物营养学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期1394-1400,共7页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANIMAL NUTRITION
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金项目(31201825)
关键词 羊驼 绵羊 外流速率 滞留时间 alpaca sheep outflow rate retention time
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1郭文场,张嘉保,陈树宁.羊驼的饲养管理和产品的开发利用(1)[J].特种经济动植物,2014,17(8):7-10. 被引量:5
  • 2庞亚妙,许冬梅,耿建军.羊驼胃的消化特征[C]//中国驼业进展:第二届中国骆驼大会.阿勒泰:中国畜牧业协会,2013:163-166.
  • 3VON ENGELHARDT W.Forestomach motility in lla- mas and camels [J].Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochens- chrift, 1998,105 (12) : 472-474.
  • 4CEBRA C, ANDERSON D E, TIBARY A, et al.Lla- ma and alpaca care : medicine, surgery, reproduction, nutrition, and herd health [M]1. Amsterdam : Elsevier Health Sciences, 2013.
  • 5SPONHEIMER M, ROBINSON T, ROEDER B, et al. Digestion and passage rates of grass hays by llamas, alpacas, goats, rabbits, and horses [J]. Small Ruminant Research, 2003,48 ( 2 ) : 149-154.
  • 6SAN MARTIN F, BRYANT F C. Nutrition of domes- ticated South American llamas and alpacas [J]. Small Ruminant Research, 1989,2 ( 3 ) : 191-216.
  • 7ALDERMAN G. Prediction of the energy value of compound feeds [M]//HARESIGN W, COLE D J A. Recent advances in animal nutrition. London: Butter- worths, 1985 : 3-53.
  • 8马燕芬,杨淑青,薛瑞婷,胡红莲,杜瑞平,牛文艺,高民.饲粮NFC/NDF对奶山羊甲烷和二氧化碳排放量的影响[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(5):996-1003. 被引量:16
  • 9BARTOCCI S, AMICI A, VERNA M, et al. Solid and fluid passage rate in buffalo, cattle and sheep fed diets with different forage to concentrate ratios [J]. Live- stock Production Science, 1997,52 (3) : 201-208.
  • 10中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局,中国国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T13088-2006.饲料中铬的测定[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2006.

二级参考文献33

  • 1马丽娟,杨沛霖.四种饲料通过狍瘤胃的外流速度测定[J].特产研究,2005,27(1):19-22. 被引量:1
  • 2颜品勋,冯仰廉,杨雅芳,莫放.青粗饲料蛋白质及有机物瘤胃降解规律的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,1996,32(4):42-43. 被引量:51
  • 3霍启光.饲料生物学评定技术[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,1996.3-6.
  • 4JOUNARY A R,NEWBOLDJ. Methane product by ruminants: its contribution to global warming[J] .Journal of Dairy Science, 2000 ,49 : 231 - 253.
  • 5JOHNSON K A, HUYLER M T, WEST BERG H H, et al. Measurement of methane emission from rumi?nant livestock using SF6 tracer technique[J] . Environ?mental Science Technology, 1994,28 :359 -362.
  • 6YAN T,MAYNE S,PORTER M G. Effect of dietary and animal factors on methane production in dairy cows offered grass silage based diets[J] . International Congress Series ,2006,1293: 123 -126.
  • 7LANA R P , RUSSELLJ B, V AN AMBURGH M E. The role of pH in regulating ruminal methane and am?monia production[J].Journal of Animal Science, 1998,76 :2190 -2196.
  • 8HRISTOV AN, NAN M, RODE L M, et al. Fermen?tation characteristics and ruminal ciliate protozoal pop- ulations in cattle fed medium- or high-concentrate bar?ley-based diets[J].Journal of Animal Science, 2001 , 79:515 -524.
  • 9BEAUCHEMIN K A, MCGINN S M. Methane emis?sions from feedlot cattle fed barley or corn diets[J] .Journal of Animal Science,2005,83:653 -66l.
  • 10CHRISTOPHERSEN C T, WRIGHT A D G, VER?COE P E. In vitro methane emission and acetate: peo?pionate ratios are decreased when artificial stimulation of the rumen wall is combined with increasing grain diets in sheep[J] .Journal of Animal Science, 2008 , 86:384 -389.

共引文献29

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部