期刊文献+

近十二年天津中考语文命题研究述评 被引量:2

A Twelve-year Review of the Chinese Language Test Papers for High-school Entrance Examination in Tianjin
下载PDF
导出
摘要 2003至2014年天津中考语文命题是在新课程改革背景下进行的。按照发展脉络,可以划分为三个不同阶段。在发展过程中,命题受到政策导向、教学实情、社会认知、学科进展等因素影响。期间,取得了诸如研究确定考核方向、创设真实情景、尊重个体感受等经验,同时也存在名著导读考核范围窄化、对学情过于迁就等不足。 The Chinese language test papers of Tianjin High -school Entrance Examination (2003 -2014) were developed in the context of implementing the reform of National Curriculum. The development process of these papers, which can be divided into three stages, was affected by several factors including the orientation of educational policy, the reality of teaching, the social cognition, and the academic development of the subject. During this period, some good practices, such as the research on testing objectives, the designing of authentic situation and the consideration of individual's feelings etc. were formulated and can be drawn on, and some need to be further improved, say, to enlarge the testing scope of the classics and to give proper attention to the reality of teaching.
作者 陈畅
出处 《考试研究》 2015年第3期27-32,共6页 Examinations Research
基金 天津市"十二五"教育科学规划课题"建构中考语文学科学业评价标准的应用研究"(批准号:BEXⅡ4001)研究成果之一
关键词 中考 语文 命题 研究述评 Review, Paper Development, Chinese language, High -school Entrance Examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献21

  • 1[美]Popham W.J..《促进教学的课堂评价》,国家基础教育课程改"促进教师发展与学生成长的评价研究"项目组译,北京:中国轻工业出版社,2003年版,第7页.
  • 2上海市教委.《上海市教育委员会关于进一步规范课程教学工作深入实施素质教育的若干意见》(沪教委基[2010]23号).
  • 3北京市教委、北京市人民政府教育督导室.《关于切实减轻中小学生过重课业负担的通知》(京教基一[2013]2号).
  • 4[美]泰勒.《课程与教学的基本原理》,黄炳煌编译,台北:桂冠图书公司出版社,1981年版,第6页.
  • 5Bangert-Drowns R. L. , Kulik J. A. Kulik C. C. Effects of Frequent Classroom Testing. The Journal of Educational Research, 1991,85 (2) : 89 - 99.
  • 6Hausknecht J. P. et. al. Retesting in selection:A meta-analysis of coaching and practice effects for tests of cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology ,2007,92(2) : 373-385.
  • 7Shin S. ,Slater C. L. &. Backhoff E. Principal perceptions and student achievement in reading in Korea, Mexico, and the United States: educational leadership, school autonomy, and use of test results. Educational Administration quarterly,2012,49(3) :480-527.
  • 8Oakes J. Keeping Track ..How Schools Structure Inequality (2 edition). New Haven, CT.. Yale University Press,2005:61-149.
  • 9Hallinan M. T. The detracking movement., why children are still grouped by ability. Education Next, 2004,4(4): 72-76.
  • 10[美]安德森等.《布卢姆教育目标分类学修订版》,蒋小平等译,北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2009年版,第30-70页.

共引文献25

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部