期刊文献+

MRI对CT检查阴性轻度脑损伤患者预后判断的价值 被引量:1

Prognosis value of MRI scan in mild traumatic brain injury with negative CT findings
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨MRI对头颅CT检查阴性的轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)患者预后判断的价值。方法对60例CT检查阴性、MRI检查阳性的mTBI患者进行预后评估,分析MRI上病灶位置与患者临床资料及预后的关系,伤后6个月采用格拉斯哥预后扩展量表(GOSE)对患者进行预后判断评估。结果60例患者中,恢复良好(GOSE7N8分)45例,中等残疾(GOSE5~6分)15例。全部患者CT检查均为阴性,而MRI检查发现异常信号。T1WI为高、低信号。T2WI及液体衰减反转恢复序列(FLAIR)均为高信号。MRI病灶位置、抑郁、注意力不集中及创伤后意识丧失在不同预后患者问比较均有统计学差异(均P〈005)。多因素分析发现MRI额下叶病灶(OR=133.95%CI=1.45~1.76,P〈0.05)、注意力不集中(OR=1.47,95%CI=1.38~1.59,P〈005)、存在意识丧失(OR=1.01,95%C1=0.56~158,P〈0.05)与患者发生中等残疾呈正相关。结论MRI联合临床资料分析对评估mTBI患者预后具有很好的预测价值,进而能为mTBI患者的早期治疗、预后判断提供更多信息,. Objective To evaluate the application of MRI scan in prediction for disease outcome of mild traumatic brain injury(mTBI) patients with negative CT findings. Methods The outcome of 60 mTBI patients with negative CT and positive MRI findings were retrospectively reviewed. The disease outcomes were assessed with Glasgow Outcome Scale- Extended (GOSE) at 6 months after traumatic injury. The relationship between the outcomes and location of disease on MRI or clinical find- ing was analyzed. Results The disease outcomes included good recovery (GOSE 7~8) in 45 cases and moderate disability (GOSE 5-6) in 15 cases. In MRI scan the lesions had relatively high or low intensity on T1WI, high intensity on T2WI and FLAIR. The location of lesions on MRI, the depressing feeling or poor concentration or loss of consciousness were associated with outcome prediction (all P〈0.05). Multivariate analysis shewed that lesions in left lower frontal Iobe(OR=1.33, 95%C1= 1.45-1.76, P〈0.05), poor concentration (OR=1.47, 95%C1=1.38~1.59, P〈0.05), loss of consciousness (OR=1.01, 95%CI=0.56-1.58, P〈0.05) were correlated with moderate disability. Conclusion MRI and clinical findings are of predictive value for outcomes of mTBI patients with negative CT results.
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2015年第8期654-657,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
基金 台州学院科研项目(2014QN031) 台州市椒江科研项目(142068)
关键词 磁共振成像 轻度创伤性脑损伤 预后 CT阴性 MRI mTBI Prognosis Negative CT
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Cassidy J D, Carroll L J, Peloso P M, et al. Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury [J]. J Rehabil Med,2004,43 Suppl:28-60.
  • 2Hung R, Carroll L J, Cancelliere C, et al. Systematic review of the clinical course, natural history, and prognosis for pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2014,95(3 Suppl):S 174-191.
  • 3Iverson G L. Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury[J].Curr ~pin Psychiatry,2005,18(3):301-317.
  • 4Lee H, Wintermark M, Gean A D, et al. Focal lesions in acute mild traumatic brain injury and neurocognitive outcome: CT versus 3T MRI[J].J Neurotrauma,2008,25(9): 1049-1056.
  • 5Eierud C, Craddock R C,Fletcher S,et aI.Neuroimaging after mild traumatic brain injury: Review and meta-analysis[J]. Neuroimage Clin,2014,4:283-294.
  • 6von Wild K,Terwey S.Diagnostic confusion in mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). Lessons from clinical practice and EFNS-inquiry. European Federation of Neurological Societies[J]. Brain Inj,2001, 15(3):273-277.
  • 7Jennett B,Snoek J,Bond M R,et aI.Disability after severe head in- jury: observations on the use of the Glasgow ~utcome Scale[J].JNeurol Neurosurg Psychiatry,1981,44(4):285-293.
  • 8沈比先,高德宏,黎刚,彭珂文,刘春利.急性脑外伤CT与MRI的对比分析[J].实用放射学杂志,2005,21(6):576-578. 被引量:5
  • 9Manolakaki D,Velmahos G C,Spaniolas K,et al. Early magnetic resonance imaging is unnecessary in patients with traumatic brain injury[J]. J Trauma,2009,66(4): 1008-1012.
  • 10Yuh E L, Mukherjee P, Lingsma H F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging improves 3-month outcome prediction in mild trau- matic brain injury[J].Ann Neurol,2013,73(2):224-235.

二级参考文献16

  • 1陆明.MRI在急性脑外伤中的应用[J].实用放射学杂志,1996,12(10):623-625. 被引量:4
  • 2Hukkelhoven CW, Steyerberg EW, Habbema JD, et al. Predic- ting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and valida- tion of a prognostic score based on admission characteristics. J Neurotrauma, 2005, 22( 10):1025- 1039.
  • 3Cremer OL, Moons KG, van Dijk GW, et al. Prognosis following severe head injury : Development and validation of a model for pre- dietion of death, disability, and functional recovery. J Trauma, 2006, 61 (6) : 1484 - 1491.
  • 4Pang BC, Kuralmani V, Joshi R, et al. Hybrid outcome predic- tion model for sever traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma, 2007, 24(1) :136 -146.
  • 5Adams JH, Doyle D, Ford I, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in head injury: definition, diagnosis and grading. Histopathology, 1989,15(1): 49-59.
  • 6Li XY, Feng DF. Diffuse axonal injury: novel insights into detec- tion and treatment. J Clin Neurosci, 2009, 16(5) :614 -619.
  • 7Skandsen T, Kvistad KA, Solheim O, et al. Prevalence and im- pact of diffuse axonal injury in patients with moderate and severe head injury: a cohort study of early magnetic resonance imaging findings and 1 - year outcome. J Neurosurg, 2010, 113 (3) : 556 - 563.
  • 8Le TH, Gean AD. Neuroimaging of traumatic brain injury. Mt Sinai J Med, 2009, 76(2) :145 -162.
  • 9Offiah C, Twigg S. Imaging assessment of penetrating craniocere- bral and spinal trauma. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(12) : 1146 - 1157.
  • 10Cordobes F, Lobato RD, Rivas JJ, et al. Post - traumatic diffuse axonal brain injury. Analysis of 78 patients studied with compu- ted tomography. Acta Neurochir, 1986, 81 (1 -2) :27 -35.

共引文献15

同被引文献13

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部