民营钢铁企业合法性危机后的自我修复与政府作为

Repairing Legitimacy of Private Steel Enterprises and Measures of Governments

本文通过分析三家民营钢铁企业合法性危机后政府参与解决合法性危机的过程,重点考察了实践中政府对民营企业的态度和行为,以及民营企业为争取自身利益而采取的行动。研究发现,民营企业的合法性还是远远低于国有企业的合法性,当双方利益发生冲突时,政府保护的往往是国有企业;地方政府在处理民营企业的合法性危机时,更偏爱采用行政手段而不是司法手段;随着政府法治水平的提高,在多种制度相互约束的情况下,民营企业利用法律手段维护自身权益的可能性和效果在提高。在政府积极推进国有企业混合所有制改革的背景下,这一研究对于民营企业如何保护自身权益,对于政府部门如何调动民营企业参与改革的积极性有一定的启示作用。

This paper analyzes the legitimacy crisis and repairing process of three private steel enterprises, focusing on the governments＇ attitudes and behavior, own interests. We find that： the legality of private and private enterprises＇ actions taken to fight for their enterprises is still far below the legitimacy of the state-owned, and when the conflicts of economic interests arise between the private and the state-owned enterprises, the interests of state-owned enterprises are more likely to be protected than the interests of private enterprises; local governments prefer administrative measures rather than judicial means in dealing with the legitimacy crisis of private enterprises; under the dual constraints of the local governments and the central government, the higher the extent of government rule of law, the higher the possibility and effect that the private enterprises use legal means to protect their own rights and interests.