两种步态量表在脑卒中偏瘫步行评定中的评测者间信度被引量：9

Inter-rater Reliability of Wisconsin Gait Scale and Gait Abnormality Rating Scale in Hemiplegic Patients after Stroke

下载PDF

导出

摘要目的：研究威斯康辛步态量表（WGS）、异常步态分级量表（GARS）在脑卒中异常步态评价中的评测者间信度。方法2名物理治疗师对20例脑卒中后偏瘫患者前、后、左、右方向上的步行视频根据WGS、GARS进行评价。采用等级间相关系数（ICC）评价WGS和GARS的评测者间信度。结果 WGS评测者间信度ICC=0.327~1， GARS评测者间信度ICC=0~0.875。结论WGS具有较好的评测者间信度，较GARS更适用于脑卒中偏瘫患者的步态评定。 Objective To study the inter-rater reliability of Wisconsin Gait Scale （WGS） and Gait Abnormality Rating Scale （GARS） in patients with stroke. Methods 20 hemiplegic patients were required to walk on their comfortable speed and videotaped from frontal, back-ward and lateral. The video recordings were scored with WGS and GARS by 2 experienced physical therapists. Intraclass correlation coeffi-cient （ICC） was calculated for the scores in each category and the total score. Results ICC for the WGS were 0.372~1, and were 0~0.875 for the GARS. Conclusion WGS is more appropriater to assess the gait of hemiplegic stroke patients than GARS.

作者胡楠卢茜李军邓思宇毕胜

机构地区解放军总医院康复医学中心

出处《中国康复理论与实践》 CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期549-551,共3页 Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice

关键词脑卒中步态威斯康辛步态量表异常步态分级量表评测者间信度 stroke gait Wisconison Gait Scale Gait Abnormality Rating Scale inter-rater reliability

分类号 R743.3 [医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献17

1Anne SC, Marjorie HW.毕胜,燕铁斌,王宁华,译.运动控制原理与实践[M]. 3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009: 336-355.
2Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, et al. Clinical gait assessment inthe neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness [J]. PhysTher, 1984, 64(1): 3^-40.
3Viosca E,Martinez JL, Almagro PL, et al. Proposal and validation of anew functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use [J]. ArchPhys Med Rehabil, 2005,86(6): 1234-1238.
4Collen FM, Wade DT,Robb GF,et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: afurther development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment [J]. Int Dis-abil Stud, 1991, 13(2): 50-54.
5Wade DT, Hewer RL. Functional abilities after stroke: measurement,natural history and prognosis [J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1987,50(2): 177-182.
6Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, et al. Classification of walking handi-cap in the stroke population [J]. Stroke, 1995, 26(6): 982-989.
7Rodriquez AA, Black PO, Kile KA, et al. Gait training efficacy using ahome-based practice model in chronic hemiplegia [J]. Arch Phys MedRehabil, 1996, 77(8): 801-805.
8Wolfson L, Whipple R, Amerman P, et al. Gait assessment in the elder-ly: a gait abnormality rating scale and its relation to falls [J]. J Geron-tol, 1990,45(1):M12-M19.
9Wellmon RCSRJ. The interrater and intrarater reliability of the Wiscon-sin Gait Scale when administered by physical therapists to individualspost-stroke [C]. Tampa, Florida: Proceedings of the American PhysicalTherapy Association Combined Sections Meetings, 2003: 54-56, 35-39.
10Rubertone Ja BKBJ. Reliability analysis of the Wisconsin Gait Scalefor novice evaluators [J]. Phys Ther, 2000,80: S19.