布什与奥巴马政治演说的隐喻架构分析——以国情咨文中关于税收的演说为例被引量：1

A Metaphorical Framing Analysis of Bush's and Obama's Political Speeches

下载PDF

导出

摘要运用隐喻架构理论和美国两党道德模式分析政治语篇中的隐喻性表层架构和深层架构,能够帮助人们很好地理解政治话语,剖析政治演说中蕴含的深层内涵。通过对布什与奥巴马国情咨文关于税收演说的隐喻架构分析,发现布什主要使用了两个隐喻性表层架构:旅程架构和财务管理架构;奥巴马主要使用了三个隐喻性表层架构:旅程架构、商业架构和灾难架构。在架构的使用上,布什能够使用更加恰当的架构来强调共和党的执政理念,并使用能够能激起人们不满的架构来评价民主党,而奥巴马更加容易陷入共和党的陷阱,减弱了其演说的接受度。政治家在其政治演说中智慧地使用词语驾驭架构非常重要。 Applying metaphorical framing theory and two parties＇ moral models of the US to analyze the meta- phorical surface frame and deep frame could help people to understand political discourse exactly. It also can dis- sect the deep connotation of political discourse. Through the metaphorical framing analysis of Bush＇s and Obama＇s speeches on tax in their State of Union Address, we find that Bush mainly used two metaphorical surface frame which are ＂journey frame＂ and ＂financial management frame＂. Obama mainly used three metaphorical surface frames which are ＂journey frame＂, ＂commercial frame＂ and ＂disaster frame＂. In the use of frame, Bush used more appropriate frame to emphasize the governing idea of the Republican Party, and also used the frame which can arouse the public dissatisfaction to evaluate the Democratic Party. Obama is much easier to fall into the trap of Re- publican Party, which weakens the acceptance of his speech. It is very important that politicians drive the frame by using words wisely in their political speeches.

作者梁婧玉汪少华

机构地区南京师范大学外国语学院

出处《山西师大学报（社会科学版）》 2015年第3期56-61,共6页 Journal of Shanxi Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基金教育部人文社科研究一般项目(11YJA740085) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研计划创新项目(KYLX_0685)

关键词隐喻架构政治演说国情咨文税收 metaphor frame political discourse state of the union address tax

分类号 D089 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献11

1Charteris-Black J. Britain as a container: immigration met- aphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Socie- ty, 2006, (5).
2Burnes S. Metaphors in press reports of elections: Obama walked on water, but Musharraf was beaten by a knockout. Journal of Pragmatics, 2011, (8).
3Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and thought, 1993, (2).
4Lakoff G. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1996/ 2002.
5Lakoff G. Don't Think of an Elephant Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publish- ing, 2004.
6Lakoff G. The Political Mind: Why You Can't Understand 21st Century Politics With an 18th Century Brain. New York : Viking, 2008.
7汪少华.美国政治语篇的隐喻学分析——以布什和奥巴马的演讲为例[J].外语与外语教学,2011(4):53-56. 被引量：78
8Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
9Fillmore CJ. An Alternative to Checklist Theories of Mean- ing. Proceedings of the First Annual Meeting of the Berke- ley Linguistics Society. ed. Cogen, C. , Thompson, H. & Thurgood, G. et al. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistics Socie- ty, 1975.
10Lakoff,G, Johnson M. Philosophy in the flesh: The em- bodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic books. 1999.

二级参考文献11

1Charteris-Black, J. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor A- nalysis [ M ]. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
2Fairclough,N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis:The Critical Study of Language [ M ]. London : Longman.
3Fairclough, N. 2001. Language and Power [ M]. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.
4Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh:The Embod-led Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought [M ]. New York Basic Books.
5Lakoff, G. 2002. Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think[ M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
6Lakoff, G. 2004. Don' t Think of an Elephant ! Know your Values and Frame the Debate [ M]. Hartford: Chelsea Green Publishing.
7Lakoff, G. 2008. The Political Mind: Why You Can' t Understand 21st Century Politics With an 18th Century Brain[ M]. New York: Viking.
8van Dijk, T. 1998. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach [ M]. London : Sage.
9van Dijk, T. 2008. Discourse and Context: A Sociocognitive Ap- proach [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10汪少华.谚语·架构·认知[J].外语与外语教学,2008(6):4-6. 被引量：54