期刊文献+

GP句加工不充分的新证据:运用文本变化检测范式

Underspecification of Garden-path Sentence:New Evidence by Using Text-change Paradigm
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过回答问题证实中国英语学习者的句法加工存在GP效应,GP句阅读时间短于Non-GP句;利用文本变化检测范式发现,在GP句短文中,受试对符合重新分析深层结构的填充词"it"并不敏感,难以检测到"it"预指时所引起的文本变化,阅读时间缩短。Non-GP句短文则无显著性差别。实验结果为重新分析不充分赋值理论提供证据,进一步证实语言分析机制满足于"足够好"以达成适当理解话语的表征。 In our study,an experiment is first conducted with short texts including Adjunct Clause containing temporary direct object / subject ambiguities or disambiguates followed by comprehension question. It’s revealed that Chinese English learners show garden path( GP) effects with local ambiguities and read syntactically ambiguous sentences faster than disambiguated strings. Then,a text-change paradigm was devised to study the depth of semantic processing during reading those Garden-path short texts by adding "it"before or after NP which is consistent with the underlying partially unreanalyzed structure. The result indicates that language input is represented at a degree of specification that is sufficient only for a good enough representation of language processing.
作者 黄洁 王微萍
出处 《外国语文》 北大核心 2015年第2期98-104,共7页 Foreign Languages and Literature
关键词 花园路径句 句法加工 不充分表征 garden-path sentence syntactic processing underspecified representation
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Barton, S. B. & A. J. A. Sanford. A Case Study of A- nomaly Detection: Shallow Semantic Processing and Cohe- sion Establishment [ J]. Memory and Cognition, 1993 (21) : 477 -487.
  • 2Christianson, K. , A. Hollingworth, J.F. Halliwell & F. Ferreira. Thematic -roles Assigned along the Garden Path Linger [ J ]. Cognitive Psychology, 2001 ( 42 ): 368 - 407.
  • 3Christianson, K., C. C. Williams, R. T. Zaeks & F. Ferreira. Misinterpretaions of Garden - path Sentences by Older and Young Ddults [ ] ]. Discourse Processes, 2006 (42) : 205 -238.
  • 4Chr/stianson, K. Sensitivity to Syntactic Changes in Gar- den Path Sentences [ J ]. Psycholinguist Research, 2008 (37) : 391 -403.
  • 5Ferreira, F., K. G. D. Bailey & V. Ferraro. Good- e- nough Representations in Language Comprehension [ J ]. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2002 ( 11 ) : 11 -15.
  • 6Ferreira, F., K. Christianson & A. Hollingworth. Misin- terpretations of Garden - path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis [ J ]. Jour- nal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2001 (30) : 3 -20.
  • 7Fodor, J. D. & A. Inoue. Attach Anyway [ M] //J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira. Reanalysis in Sentence Processing. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998 : 101 - 141.
  • 8Meyer, D. E. & R. W. Schvaneveldt. Facilitation in Recognizing Pairs of Words: Evidence of a Dependence between Retrieval Operations [ J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1971 (90):227-234.
  • 9Petrovitz, W. The Effect of Discourse Factors on Backward Anaphora [J]. Word, 1996 (47): 1-12.
  • 10Pritchett, B. L. Grammar Competence and Parsing Per- formance [ M ]. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1992.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Christianson,K.,et al.Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger[J].Cognitive Psychology,2001,42:368-407.
  • 2Ferreira,F.& K.McClure.Parsing of garden-path sentences with reciprocal verbs[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,1997,12(2/3):273-306.
  • 3Ferreira,F.,K.Christianson & A.Hollingworth.Misinterpretations of garden-path sentences:Implications for models of sentence processing and reanalysis[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2001,30(1):1-20.
  • 4Fodor,J.D.& A.Inoue.Attach anyway[A].In Fodor,J.D.& F.Ferreira(eds.).Reanalysis in Sentence Processing[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer,1998.101-141.
  • 5Ford,M.,J.Bresnan & R.Kaplan.A competence-based theory of syntactic closure[A].In Bresnan,J.(ed.).The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations[C].Cambridge,MA:MIT press,1982.727-796.
  • 6Frazier,L.& C.Jr.Clifton.Sentence reanalysis and visibility[A].In Fodor,J.D.& F.Ferreira (eds.).Reanalysis in Sentence Processing[C].Dordrecht:Kluwer,1998.143-176.
  • 7Gibson,E.& N.J.Pearlmutter.Distinguishing serial and parallel parsing[J].Journal of Psycholingnistic Research,2000,29(2):231-240.
  • 8Juliano,C.& M.K.Tanenhaus.A constraintbased lexicalist account of the subject/object attachment preference[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,1994,23:459-471.
  • 9Lewis,R.L.Falsifying serial and parallel parsing models:Empirical conundrums and an overlooked paradigm[J].Journal of Psycholinguistic Research,2000,29(2):241-248.
  • 10Meng,M.& M.Bader.Ungrammaticality detection and garden path strength:Evidence for serial parsing[J].Language and Cognitive Processes,2000,15:615-666.

共引文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部