期刊文献+

基于模态柔度理论的结构损伤诊断试验研究 被引量:14

Experimental Research on Structural Damage Detection Based on Modal Flexibility Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用多参考点脉冲锤击法的输入输出动力信号获取结构的模态柔度,可以对结构进行损伤识别,设计了一根钢筋混凝土简支梁和一块钢-混凝土组合板的静动力试验.对不同损伤状态下的简支梁和组合板进行了动力测试,得到其模态柔度矩阵,并用来预测结构在荷载作用下的位移.简支梁试验结果表明,随着损伤程度的加深,结构自振频率降低,阻尼比增大,柔度增大,但自振频率只能判断结构损伤的出现,模态柔度则能够综合全面地反映钢筋混凝土简支梁结构的损伤位置和损伤程度.组合板试验表明,在线弹性状态下,动力测试与静力测试获得的模态柔度矩阵相差很小.设计了支座刚度变化、连接件损伤和横向支撑破坏这3种损伤工况,并用这3种工况来模拟实际桥梁结构可能出现的损伤状况.通过对比结构损伤前后的模态柔度位移信息,成功实现了组合板的损伤识别. The utilization of the input and output dynamic signals from multiple reference hammer impact method (MRIT)for modal flexibility extraction and structural damage identification was studied. Static and dynamic experiments on a Reinforced Concrete (RC)simply supported beam and a steel-concrete composite bridge deck were designed.MRIT was conducted on the simply supported beam and composite plate under different damage states,and modal flexibility was obtained in the test,which can be used to predict the displacement under applied loading.The beam test results demonstrated that the natural frequency decreased while the damping ratio and flexibility increased with the development of damage.Changes of natural frequency can only determine the existence of structural damage,while the changes of modal flexibility can indicate the damage location and damage degree of RC beam.Steel-concrete composite slab test results demonstrated that the differences between dynamic flexibility and static flexibility match well under the linear elastic state.Three damage cases were designed to simulate the damage situation on real bridges,which are the removal of cross diaphragm,changes of boundary condition and damage of connectors.By comparing modal flexibility information before and after structural damage,the damage of steelconcrete composite slab was achieved.
出处 《湖南大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第5期36-45,共10页 Journal of Hunan University:Natural Sciences
基金 国家自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(51208190) 湖南省自然科学基金青年基金资助项目(12JJ4053) 高校博士点基金新教师基金资助项目(20120161120028) 湖南大学青年教师成长计划资助项目~~
关键词 多参考点脉冲锤击法 模态柔度 损伤识别 简支梁 组合结构 multiple reference impact test modal flexibility damage identification simply-supported beam composite structures
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1CATBAS F N, KIJEWSKI-CORREA T, AKTAN A E. Structural identification (St-Id) of constructed facilities: ap- proaches, methods and technologies for effective practice of St Id[C]//A State-of-the-Art Report by ASCE SEI Commit tee on Structural Identification of Constructed Systems. Phila- delphia : Drexel University, 2011.
  • 2RYTTER A. Vibration based inspection of civil engineering structures [D]. Aalborg: Aalborg University, 1993.
  • 3HOGUE T D, AKTAN A E, HOYOS A. Localized identifi- cation of constructed facilities [J]. ASCE Journal of Struc- tural Engineering ,1991, 117(1) :128-148.
  • 4RAGHAVENDRACHAR M, AKTAN A E. Flexibility by multireference impact [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engi neering, 1992, 118(8) :2186-2203.
  • 5AKTAN A E, CATBAS N, TURER A, et al. Structural identification: analytical aspects[J]. ASCE Journal of Struc- tural Engineering, 1998, 124(7):817-829.
  • 6CATBAS F N, AKTAN A E. Condition and damage assess- ment:issues and some promising indices [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2002, 128(8) : 1026- 1036.
  • 7CATBAS F N, BROWN D L, AKTAN A E. Parameter esti- mation for multiple-input multiple-output modal analysis of large structures [J]. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechan- ics, 2004, 130(1):921-930.
  • 8CATBAS F N, BROWN D L, AKTAN A E. Use of modal flexibility for damage detection and condition assessment: case studies and demonstrations on large structures [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2006, 132 (11) : 1699-1712.
  • 9PANDEY A K, BISWAS M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibra tion, 1994,169(1):3-17.
  • 10ALl.BRIGHT K, PAREKH K, MILLER R, et al. Modal verification of a destructive test of a damaged prestressed con- crete beam [J]. Experimental Mechanics, 1994,34 (4) : 389- 396.

二级参考文献21

  • 1刘晖,瞿伟廉,袁润章.基于有限测点信息的结构损伤识别柔度法[J].计算力学学报,2005,22(3):379-384. 被引量:9
  • 2曹水东,李传习,徐飞鸿,张建仁.基于结构柔度矩阵损伤识别的柔度曲率比法[J].长沙电力学院学报(自然科学版),2006,21(1):85-88. 被引量:7
  • 3曹晖,Michael I.Friswell.基于模态柔度曲率的损伤检测方法[J].工程力学,2006,23(4):33-38. 被引量:73
  • 4肖调生,阳勇.结构损伤识别的柔度差值曲率法[J].吉首大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(2):74-76. 被引量:9
  • 5Cawley E Adams R D. The location of defects in structures from measurements of natural frequencies [J]. Journal of Strain Analysis, 1979, 14(2): 49-57.
  • 6Raghavendrachar M, Aktan A E. Flexibility by multireference impact testing for bridge diagnostics [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1992, 118(8): 2186-2203.
  • 7Zhao J, De Wolf J T. Sensitivity study for vibration parameters used in damage detection [J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 1999, 125(4): 410-416.
  • 8Pandey A K, Biswas M. Damage detection in structures using changes in flexibility [J]. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1994, 169(1): 3-17.
  • 9Pandey A K, Biswas M. Damage diagnosis of truss structures by estimation of flexibility change [J]. Modal Analysis, 1995, 10(2): 104-117.
  • 10Ko J M. Multi-stage identification scheme for detecting damage in cable-stayed Kap Shui Mun bridge [J]. Engineering Structures, 2002, 24: 857-868.

共引文献57

同被引文献76

引证文献14

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部