“新生儿脑病”比“缺氧缺血性脑病”更合适吗？——美国妇产科学会和儿科学会发布的新生儿脑病工作组报告介绍

Is the term ＆quot;neonatal encephalopathy＆quot; better than ＆quot;hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy ？——Introduction of the report of Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy published by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Academy of Pe

已经广泛使用30多年的“新生儿缺氧缺血脑病”,作为标准术语越来越受到质疑,大多推荐用“新生儿脑病”代替“缺氧缺血性脑病”.2014年美国妇产科学会和儿科学会分别发布新生儿脑病工作组报告《新生儿脑病和神经系统结果（第2版）》,对“新生儿脑病”的定义、诊治相关内容进行更新,推荐对新生儿脑病作综合性多维评估.该文将介绍关于“新生儿脑病”与“缺氧缺血性脑病”的争议和新生儿脑病工作组报告的内容.

＆quot;Neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy＆quot; as a standard term has been used for over 30 years,but now increasingly being questioned.Most experts recommend using ＆quot;neonatal encephalopathy＆quot; instead of ＆quot;hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy＆quot;.The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and The American Academy of Pediatrics published separately the report of Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy ＆quot;Neonatal Encephalopathy and Neurologic Outcome,Second Edition＆quot; in 2014.Definition,diagnosis and treatment of ＆quot;neonatal encephalopathy＆quot; and other content have been updated in the report.It is recommended that a comprehensive multidimensional assessment be performed of neonatal encephalopathy.This article will introduce the controversy about ＆quot;neonatal encephalopathy＆quot; or ＆quot;hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy＆quot; and contents of the report of Task Force on Neonatal Encephalopathy.