摘要
在申请强制执行仲裁裁决过程中,被申请人缺席是十分常见的,原因主要有被申请人下落不明或逃避执行、申请人一方虚假仲裁以及双方仲裁欺诈等。同时被申请人缺席执行程序可能导致案外第三人的合法利益受损,但立法并未纳入裁定不予执行仲裁裁决的法定事由。基于司法审查价值、仲裁自治性、诚实信用原则等考量因素,并进行各种规制路径分析,立法应予规定被申请人缺席情形之下损害第三人的,法院应当依职权裁定不予执行该仲裁裁决。
In the process of applying for the enforcement of arbitration award, the absence of the applicant is very common,mainly because of the missing or evading the implementation of the applicant, the false arbitration of the applicant and the fraud arbitration of the two parties. The absence of the applicant in the execution program may result in damage to the legitimate interests of the third party outside the case, but which is not the statutory reason for refusal to enforce an arbitration award included in the legislative decision. Based on the value of judicial review, the autonomy of arbitration, the principle of good faith and credit and the analysis of various regulatory paths, the legislation should provide that when there was damage to the third party for the absence of the applicant, the court would refuse to enforce the arbitration award.
出处
《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》
2015年第2期39-42,共4页
Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
关键词
不予执行仲裁裁决
仲裁自治性
司法审查制度
诚实信用原则
司法解释
refusal to enforce an arbitration award
autonomy of arbitration
judicial review system
principle of good faith and credit
judicial interpretation