摘要
新常态下的行政治理存在保障行政与交易行政的二元结构。保障行政搭配相对人消极同意,具有维护公共利益、保障行政秩序及修复受损权利的功能;交易行政中,行政主体与相对人为各自期待利益绑定在一起,分别实现各自的增量利益。保障行政交易化,相对人消极同意的积极化,是行政与相对人关系错位的表现;相对人积极同意消极化是相对人积极同意在交易行政中缺位的表现。前者于法不容,后者于理不合。对此应在制度上界分保障行政与交易行政,进而改进和完善国家的行政治理机制。
In the context of new normal,administration has the dual structure of the administration of security and the administration of transaction,corresponding to the counterpart's passive consent and positive consent.The administration of security with the passive consent of counterpart,might maintain the public interest,administrative order,and supplies relief to the infringed.In the administration of transaction,the administrative subject combines the counterpart to realize respective interests,which are expected to generate incremental quantity of benefits.There is misplacement where the administration of security becomes transacting,and simultaneously the passive consent of counterpart becomes positive.The absence of the counterpart's content in the administration of transaction is shown for the counterpart's passive content which should be positive.The former violate the law,and the latter is unreasonable.A distinction should be made in terms of system between administrations of security and transaction so as to rectify and improve the national administrative mechanism.
出处
《西南大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第3期40-47,189,共8页
Journal of Southwest University(Social Sciences Edition)