期刊文献+

生态文明视域下企业低碳并购的生态效率评价及优化新探 被引量:2

A New Study on Eco-Efficiency Evaluation and Optimization of Low-Carbon M&A Based on Ecological Civilization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 低碳并购是生态文明建设中出现的新型并购模式,文章首次分析了低碳并购的生态效率改善状况及优化策略。实证发现:总体上大部分低碳并购公司的生态效率有了较大改善,少量低碳并购样本甚至达到了DEA有效,但小部分低碳并购样本的生态效率反而下降。低碳并购生态效率的变化规律基本体现为先由小变大,后由大变小的趋势。企业低碳并购的短期生态绩效改善力度较大,长期生态绩效改善甚微,企业低碳并购的生态效率缺乏持续推动力。对于非有效低碳并购样本,提出了生态效率的优化路径。 Low-carbon M&A is a new mode of merger acquisition in the construction of ecological civilization, and its eco- efficiency evaluation is popular for the academic circles. By establishing DEA model, we first analyze the eco-efficiency and optimization strategies of low-carbon M&A. The empirical findings are: Overall, the major eco-efficiency of low- carbon M&A has greatly improved, and a small amount of low carbon acquisition samples even reached the DEA effective, but eco-efficiency of a small portion of low-carbon M&A samples decreased. From the perspective of change trend, a basic embodiment tend of ecological efficiency of low carbon M&A is as follows: from being small to big, and then from being big to small. The short-term eco-performance of low carbon M&A improved more intensely, little improvement of long-term ecological performance, so the ecological efficiency is lack of sustained impetus. For non-effective low-carbon acquisition samples, the paper put forward the optimization strategy for eco-efficiency. Eco-efficiency improvements require more stringent implementation of national low-carbon policies and long-term mechanism to promote ecological efficiency.
作者 田满文 李敏
机构地区 丽水学院商学院
出处 《生态经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第6期75-78,共4页 Ecological Economy
基金 国家社会科学基金项目(13CGL030) 丽水市高层次人才培养资助项目(2014RC22) 丽水市科技局公益性技术应用项目(2013JYZB12) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(11YJC630055) 浙江省重点学科"区域经济学"项目
关键词 生态文明 低碳并购 生态效率 优化策略 ecological civilization low-carbon M&A eco-efficiency optimization strategy
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献38

  • 1冯之浚.论循环经济[J].中国软科学,2004(10):1-9. 被引量:118
  • 2宋守志,钟勇,邢军.矿产资源综合利用现状与发展的研究[J].金属矿山,2006,35(11):1-4. 被引量:25
  • 3曾五一,赵楠.中国区域资本配置效率及区域资本形成影响因素的实证分析[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2007,24(4):35-42. 被引量:81
  • 4Atsku, U. , 1999, Measuring Distortion in Capital Allocation : The Case of Heavy and ChemicalIndustries in Korea [J], Journal of Police Modeling, 21, 427-452.
  • 5Basudeb Guba- Khasnobis, 2000, A Hallmark of India's New Economic Police.. Deregulation ofthe Financial Sector [J]., Journal of Asian Economics, 11, 333-346.
  • 6Cho, Y. , 1988, The Effect of Financial Liberalization on the Efficiency of Credit Allocation:Some Evidence for Korea [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 29, 101-110.
  • 7Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., Noh D. and Williaml, W., 2006, Characteristics of A PollutingTechnology.. Theory and Practice [J], Journal of Econometrics, 126, 469-492.
  • 8Gollop, F. , Swinand, G. , 1998, From Total Factor to Total Resource Productivity: An Application to Agriculture [J], American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80, 577-583.
  • 9Hailu, A., Veeman, T.S., 2001, Non- parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Out-puts : An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry [J].American Journal of Agricultural Eco- nomics, 83, 605-616.
  • 10Radelet, S. and J. D. Sachs, 1998, The East Asian Financial Crisis : Diagnosis, Remedies, Pros-pects [J]. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1-90.

共引文献207

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部