期刊文献+

西方的政治学与中国传统政治思想:从忽略到认可? 被引量:3

Western Political Sciences and Traditional Chinese Political Thought:From Indifference toward Recognition?
原文传递
导出
摘要 战国时代诸子百家的政治思想,无论是从其视野的广度、多元化及丰富程度,或从其对当时与后世的政治文化的影响上看,都是无与伦比的。然而一直到现在该思想都没有引起西方学者(无论是大部分汉学家还是政治学家)应有的关注。传统中国政治思想对西方的政治学产生影响是可能的。从学术方法上看,中国古代思想的现实性,其历史性论证方式及其所带来的灵活性,都会丰富西方的政治理论。从内容上看,尽管中国传统的思想不会成为西方政治思想的代替品,但起码会挑战西方主流政治文化一些一成不变的原则(例如政治上的绝对平等观),并让西方学者重新考虑自己的文化的缺陷。更系统地了解中国传统政治思想将扩大西方政治学的视野。 Chinese political thought of the Warring States period (453-221 BCE) is unrivalled worldwide in terms of its creativity, boldness, ideological diversity, and its immediate and long-term impact. Nonetheless, its political con- tent neither stands at the focus of explorations of Western Sinologists, nor is noticed by Western political scientists. My article analyzes the reasons behind this lackluster interest, and also outlines areas in which Western political sciences may benefit from engagement with traditional Chinese thinkers. In particular I believe that practical orientation of tradi- tional Chinese political thought, as well as its intrinsic links to history-writing and resultant flexibility may enrich West- ern political theories. In terms of content: while traditional Chinese ideas may not pose a serious alternative to dominant Western political thought, they may at the very least allow questioning and reconsidering some of the hegemonic percep- tions in modern Western political thought, such as an idea of political equality. Deeper engagement with traditional Chi- nese political thought will broaden the horizons of Western political sciences.
作者 尤锐
出处 《南开学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第3期6-14,共9页 Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition
基金 以色列科学基金(grant No.511/11) Michael William Lipson Chair in Chinese Studies的资助
关键词 诸子百家 政治思想 西方汉学 西方政治学 政治平等观 Hundred Schools Traditional Chinese Political Thought Western Sinology Western Political Science Political Equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Karl Jaspers, The Origin and Goal of History, translated by Michael Bullock. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1965.
  • 2Johann P. Arna- son, Shmuel N. Eisenstadt and Bjorm Wittroek, eds., Axial Civilization and Worm History, Leiden: Brill, 2005.
  • 3刘泽华.“文革”中的紧跟、错位与自主意识的萌生——研讨历史的思想自述之二[J].史学月刊,2012(11):97-101. 被引量:2
  • 4Sebastian de Grazia, ed., Masters of Chinese Political Thought, New York: Viking 1973.
  • 5Hsiao Kung-Chuan (Xiao Gongquan 萧公权), A History of Chinese Political Thought, Volume One: From the Beginnings to the Sixth Century A.D., translated by Frede-rick W. Mote, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1979.
  • 6Vitaly A. Rubin, Individual and State in Ancient China." Essays on Four Chinese Philosophers, translated by Steven I. Levine. New York: Columbia University Press, 1976.
  • 7Rubin, Lichnost' i vlast' v drevnem Kitae: So- branie Trudov, Moscow: "Vostoehnaia literatura" RAN, 1999, pp.8-76.
  • 8Paul R. Goldin, "Ancient Chinese Civilization: Bibliography of Materials in Western Languages," http://www.sas.uperm.edu/ealc/ paul-r-goldin.
  • 9Carine Defoort, "Is There Such a Thing as Chinese Philosophy: Arguments of an Implicit Debate," Philosophy East and West, 51 (3), 2001, pp.393-413.
  • 10Georg W.F. Hegel, Lectures on the History of Philosophy, 1825-6, Volume 1, Introduction and Odental Philosophy, Edited by Rob- ert F. Brown; translated by Robert F. Brown and J.M. Stewart with the Assistance of H.S. Harris, Oxford : Clarendon Press, 2009, p.107.

二级参考文献3

  • 1刘泽华.《困惑与思索》,张艳国主编.《史学家自述》,武汉出版社1994年版,第109-110页.
  • 2《历史研究》1978年第8期.
  • 3刘泽华、王连升.《论刘邦—兼论历史的必然性与偶然性》,《南开大学学报》1979年第2期.

共引文献2

同被引文献17

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部