期刊文献+

复杂地层钻井风险程度判别方法研究 被引量:11

Research on method of discriminating drilling risk degree in complex formations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 由于地质构造复杂和地质特征参数难以预测,复杂地层钻井具有高风险与高投入的特点。因此,井下工程风险程度的合理判别,对于钻井工程方案的风险决策具有重要的意义。针对这一问题,建立了基于风险概率和模糊理论的风险程度判别模型。首先,对常见井下工程风险进行风险概率计算;然后,在此基础上结合井史资料中的事故记录,利用模糊数学理论构造不同程度区间的隶属度函数;最后,根据隶属度进行区间划分,从而实现工程风险的程度判别。应用该方法对西部某地区的钻井资料进行实例分析,结果表明,该方法的判别结果与工程实际情况基本吻合,满足工程实际需要,能够为钻井工程方案设计提供风险判断依据。 Due to the fact that the geological structures are complex and the geological feature parameters are hard to predict, the drilling operation in complex formations is characterized by high risk and high investment. Therefore, reasonable discrimination of downhole engineering risk degrees is of great signiifcance to risk decision for drilling engineering program. For this problem, a model is built for discriminating the risk degree based on risk probability and fuzzy theory. Firstly, calculate the risk probability of common downhole engineering risks. Then, based on which and in conjunction with the incident records in the well history data use fuzzy mathematical theory to construct the subordinating degree function between various degree intervals. Finally, delineate the intervals according to subordinating degree, hence realizing the discrimination of engineering risk degrees. After outlining its discriminating principle, then the drilling data from somewhere in the west is taken as an example. Example analysis shows that the discriminating result of this method almost agrees with the actual engineering and satisifes the real need of drilling engineering and can provide basis for risk discrimination for the design of drilling engineering program.
出处 《石油钻采工艺》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2015年第3期11-14,22,共5页 Oil Drilling & Production Technology
基金 "十二五"国家科技重大专项课题"西部山前复杂地层安全快速钻完井技术"(编号:2011ZX05021-001)
关键词 钻井风险 概率 隶属度函数 模糊判别 drilling risk probability subordinating degree function fuzzy discrimination
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献33

  • 1靳景玉,刘朝明,韩斌.区域风险投资环境的AHP模糊综合评价[J].西南交通大学学报,2005,40(3):379-384. 被引量:23
  • 2于爱兵,王敏,钟利军,张义.用模糊层次分析法评价陶瓷的磨削加工性[J].天津大学学报,2006,39(7):842-846. 被引量:6
  • 3张震,于天彪,梁宝珠,王宛山.基于层次分析法与模糊综合评价的供应商评价研究[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(10):1142-1145. 被引量:79
  • 4DUMANS C F F.Quantification of the effect of uncertainties on the reliability of wellbore stability model prediction[D].Tulsa:Univ of Tulsa,1995.
  • 5NOBUO Mortia.Uncertainty analysis of borehole stability problems[R].SPE 30502,1995.
  • 6da FONTOURA Sergio A B,HOLZBERG Bruno B,TEIXIRA Edson C,et al.Probabilistic analysis of wellbore stability during drilling[R].SPE 78179,2002.
  • 7LIANG Q J.Application of quantitative risk analysis to pore pressure and fracture gradient prediction[R].SPE 77354,2002.
  • 8DAHLIN A,SNAAS J.Probabilistic well design in Oman high pressure exploration wells[R].SPE 48335,1998.
  • 9ARLID,THOMAS Nilsen,MALENE Sandony.Risk-based decision support for planning of an underbalanced drilling operation[R].SPE/IADC 91242,2004.
  • 10CUNHA J C.Recent development in risk analysis-application for petroleum engineering[R].SPE 109637,2007.

共引文献33

同被引文献88

引证文献11

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部